• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性全闭塞病变合并多支血管病变患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Multivessel Disease.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease (S.L., C.G., F.W., L.X., T.Z., Y.S., S.C., L.H., B.X., Z.Z.), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (S.L., Z.Z.), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011312. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011312. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011312
PMID:35167333
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been used increasingly as an alternative means of revascularization for patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease. We investigated 5-year clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI in patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 4324 consecutive patients with ≥1 chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease were treated with either CABG (n=2264) or PCI (n=2060) between 2010 and 2013. The primary outcome was 5-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. An inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting method was used adjusting for both patient and lesion characteristics.

RESULTS

The unadjusted 5-year composite outcomes were similar between CABG group and PCI group (12.1% [258/2264] versus 11.4% [218/2060]; =0.52). After adjustment for baseline variables, PCI was associated with significantly higher risk of composite outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.44]; =0.03). The inferiority of PCI in 5-year composite outcome was significant in patients with CABG recommendation according to SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score II (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.55 [95% CI, 1.14-2.09]; =0.005) but not evident in patients with PCI or PCI/CABG equipoise recommendation according to SYNTAX score II (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.75-1.17]; =0.56). A similar risk of 5-year composite outcomes was observed between CABG and PCI with residual SYNTAX score ≤8.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center retrospective study among patients with chronic total occlusion and multivessel disease, PCI was associated with higher risk of 5-year composite death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已越来越多地被用作慢性完全闭塞和多血管病变患者血运重建的替代方法。我们研究了慢性完全闭塞和多血管病变患者接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和 PCI 后 5 年的临床结果。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,2010 年至 2013 年间,4324 例至少有 1 处慢性完全闭塞和多血管病变的患者接受了 CABG(n=2264)或 PCI(n=2060)治疗。主要结局为死亡、心肌梗死或卒中等 5 年复合终点。采用逆概率治疗加权法调整患者和病变特征。

结果

CABG 组和 PCI 组未校正的 5 年复合结局相似(12.1%[258/2264]vs.11.4%[218/2060];=0.52)。在调整基线变量后,PCI 与复合结局的风险显著增加相关(校正后的危险比:1.21[95%可信区间,1.02-1.44];=0.03)。在根据 SYNTAX 评分(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与 Taxus 和心脏手术之间的协同作用)为 CABG 推荐的患者中,PCI 在 5 年复合结局方面的劣势显著(校正后的危险比:1.55[95%可信区间,1.14-2.09];=0.005),但在根据 SYNTAX 评分为 PCI 或 PCI/CABG 均衡推荐的患者中并不明显(校正后的危险比:0.94[95%可信区间,0.75-1.17];=0.56)。在残余 SYNTAX 评分≤8 的患者中,CABG 和 PCI 的 5 年复合结局风险相似。

结论

在这项多血管病变慢性完全闭塞患者的单中心回顾性研究中,PCI 与 5 年复合死亡、心肌梗死或卒中等风险增加相关。

相似文献

1
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Multivessel Disease.慢性全闭塞病变合并多支血管病变患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011312. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011312. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
3
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病:一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008.
4
Comparison of Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Severe Coronary Artery Disease: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST Trials.比较严重冠状动脉疾病患者完全血运重建患者中支架置入术与旁路移植术的疗效:SYNTAX、PRECOMBAT 和 BEST 临床试验的患者水平汇总分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 24;10(14):1415-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.037.
5
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Disease.多支血管病变糖尿病患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术或血流储备分数引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct;13(10):e009157. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009157. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 13;9(11):1102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.039.
7
Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后重复血运重建的发生率、特征、预测因素和结果:SYNTAX 试验 5 年随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2493-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.044.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
9
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous interventions for women with multivessel coronary artery disease.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮介入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病女性患者的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;168(3):863-872.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.009. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the Presence of Chronic Total Occlusions on the Survival of Patients Treated with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.慢性完全闭塞病变对冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗患者生存的影响。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jun 25;12(7):243. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12070243.
2
Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization Strategies: A Comparative Study of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.慢性完全闭塞病变的血运重建策略:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较研究
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 27;26(6):27226. doi: 10.31083/RCM27226. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Epidemiology and current management of cardiovascular disease in China.
中国心血管疾病的流行病学与当前管理
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Apr 28;21(4):387-406. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.04.001.
4
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Nov 6;2023:9928347. doi: 10.1155/2023/9928347. eCollection 2023.
5
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2020: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.《临床心脏病学进展 2020:重点临床试验总结》。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2170-2200. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01711-z. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Review of PCR e-Course 2020 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials.2020年PCR电子课程最新临床试验综述。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jun;27:67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Jul 23.