Hubei Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Processing and Environment, Wuhan University of Technology, Luoshi Road 122, Wuhan, 430070, China; School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Luoshi Road 122, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources Processing and Environment, Wuhan University of Technology, Luoshi Road 122, Wuhan, 430070, China; School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Luoshi Road 122, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Chemosphere. 2022 May;295:133952. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133952. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
The more and more stringent environmental standards for recalcitrant organic pollutants pushed forward the development of integration of photocatalytic and microbial wastewater treatment technologies. The past studies proposed mainly two typical integration ways: a) Independent sequence of photocatalysis and biodegradation (ISPB) conducting the sequential reactions; b) Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB) conducting the simultaneous reactions. Although ICPB has received more attraction recently due to its novelty, ISPB gives an edge in certain cases. The article reviews the state-of-the-art ISPB and ICPB studies to comprehensively compare the two systems. The strengths and weaknesses of ISPB and ICPB regarding the treatment efficiency, cost, toxicity endurance and flexibility are contradistinguished. The reactor set-ups, photocatalysts, microbial characteristics of ISPB and ICPB are summarized. The applications for different kinds of recalcitrant compounds are elaborated to give a holistic view of the removal efficiencies and transformation pathways by the two technologies. Currently, in-depth understandings about the interference among mixed pollutants, co-existing components and key parameters in realistic wastewater are urgently needed. The long-term and large-scale application cases of the integration technologies are still rare. Overall, we conclude that both ISPB and ICPB technologies are reaching maturity while challenges still exist for two systems especially regarding the reliability, economy and generalization for realistic wastewater treatment plants. Future research should not only manage to reduce the cost and energy consumption by upgrading reactors and developing novel catalysts, but also attach importance to the cocktail effects of wastewater during the sequential or simultaneous photocatalysis and biodegradation.
越来越严格的难降解有机污染物环境标准推动了光催化和微生物废水处理技术集成的发展。过去的研究主要提出了两种典型的集成方式:a)光催化和生物降解的独立序列(ISPB)进行顺序反应;b)光催化和生物降解的紧密耦合(ICPB)进行同时反应。尽管 ICPB 因其新颖性而受到越来越多的关注,但在某些情况下 ISPB 具有优势。本文综述了先进的 ISPB 和 ICPB 研究,全面比较了这两种系统。比较了 ISPB 和 ICPB 在处理效率、成本、毒性耐受和灵活性方面的优缺点。总结了 ISPB 和 ICPB 的反应器设置、光催化剂、微生物特性。阐述了不同种类难降解化合物的应用,全面展示了两种技术的去除效率和转化途径。目前,迫切需要深入了解混合污染物、共存成分和实际废水中关键参数之间的干扰。这两种集成技术的深入了解和长期、大规模的应用案例仍然很少。总的来说,我们得出结论,ISPB 和 ICPB 技术都在成熟,但这两种系统仍然存在挑战,特别是针对实际废水处理厂的可靠性、经济性和通用性。未来的研究不仅要通过升级反应器和开发新型催化剂来降低成本和能源消耗,还要重视废水在顺序或同时光催化和生物降解过程中的鸡尾酒效应。