Suppr超能文献

女性变男性跨性别者的游离前臂桡侧皮瓣阴茎再造术——Gottlieb 和 Levine 技术与 Chang 和 Hwang 技术的比较。

Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique.

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

Department of Plastic Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2022 Apr;19(4):661-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Phalloplasty is a crucial part of female-to-male genital gender-affirming surgery, however, up to date, there is still no standardized phalloplasty technique.

AIM

To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of phalloplasties using the free radial forearm flap variations by Chang and Hwang vs by Gottlieb and Levine on a similar number of transgender patients.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, 45 female to male transgender patients underwent phalloplasty using a neuro-microvascular free radial forearm flap in our department. Twenty patients underwent phalloplasty by the use of the Chang and Hwang design, whereas 25 patients were subjects to a phalloplasty according to Gottlieb and Levine technique. Patients' demographics, procedural characteristics, postoperative complications, and outcome of both groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared with each other.

RESULTS

Patients' demographics were similar in both groups. We did not observe relevant differences concerning postoperative complications comparing the two groups, except for the statistically significant lower rate of partial flap necrosis in the Gottlieb and Levine group. No statistically significant risk factors for an increase in complication rate could be identified. Urethral fistulas were the leading cause of revision.

CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Optimizing a phalloplasty surgical technique and contributing to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATION: This retrospective study presents the first comparison between the free radial forearm flap phalloplasty by Chang and Hwang and by Gottlieb and Levine performed at the same department on a similar number of transgender patients published so far.

CONCLUSION

The Chang and Hwang design is associated with a lower rate of urologic complications (fistulas, stenosis) while the Gottlieb and Levine design has a statistically significant lower incidence of partial flap necrosis. Future prospective trials are needed to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty. Spennato S, Ederer IA., Borisov K et al. Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique. J Sex Med 2022;19:661-668.

摘要

背景

阴茎成形术是女性到男性生殖器性别肯定手术的重要组成部分,但迄今为止,仍然没有标准化的阴茎成形术技术。

目的

评估 Chang 和 Hwang 与 Gottlieb 和 Levine 各自的游离桡侧前臂皮瓣技术在数量相似的跨性别患者中的单中心系列阴茎成形术的结果。

方法

在 2018 年至 2020 年期间,我们部门对 45 名女性到男性跨性别者进行了使用神经微血管游离桡侧前臂皮瓣的阴茎成形术。20 名患者接受了 Chang 和 Hwang 设计的阴茎成形术,而 25 名患者接受了 Gottlieb 和 Levine 技术的阴茎成形术。回顾性评估并比较了两组患者的人口统计学、手术特征、术后并发症和结果。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。除了 Gottlieb 和 Levine 组部分皮瓣坏死发生率较低外,两组之间在术后并发症方面没有观察到明显差异。没有确定导致并发症发生率增加的统计学显著风险因素。尿道瘘是修复的主要原因。

临床意义

优化阴茎成形术手术技术并有助于建立阴茎成形术的金标准。

优势和局限性

这是迄今为止在同一部门对数量相似的跨性别患者进行的 Chang 和 Hwang 游离桡侧前臂皮瓣阴茎成形术与 Gottlieb 和 Levine 进行的首次比较。

结论

Chang 和 Hwang 设计与较低的泌尿科并发症(瘘管、狭窄)发生率相关,而 Gottlieb 和 Levine 设计与统计学上显著较低的部分皮瓣坏死发生率相关。需要进行未来的前瞻性试验来建立阴茎成形术的金标准。Spennato S、Ederer IA、Borisov K 等人。游离桡侧前臂皮瓣在女性到男性变性者中的应用- Gottlieb 和 Levine 与 Chang 和 Hwang 技术的比较。J 性医学 2022;19:661-668.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验