Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang Indonesia.
Med Arch. 2021 Dec;75(6):431-435. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.431-435.
One of the common pediatric issues is monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (MNE). MNE is involuntarily urine-voiding in night sleep without lower urinary tract symptoms, such as daytime frequency, incontinence, or urgency. Alarm therapy and desmopressin have been used for treating MNE, but there is no clear comparison of the effectiveness of the two modalities.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of alarm therapy and desmopressin and strategies to improve the therapy.
Study searches were conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane with a time span of 2010 to 2021. The keywords used were desmopressin, alarm therapy, pediatrics, and monosymptomatic enuresis. The study included an RCT in English, and no subjects were dropped out. Studies without a definite number of subjects were excluded.
As many as 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis, 9 of which looked for response rates, and 3 were for desmopressin-withdrawal optimization strategy. Alarm therapy was superior to desmopressin in well-motivated parents and patients (p=0.02), with a combined risk ratio of 1.10 in the low heterogeneity population (Z-score = 2.31; I = 32%). A strategy that could reduce the risk of desmopressin-withdrawal was a structured dose reduction rather than a sudden dose reduction (p=0.001; I=0%; Z-score = 3.26). However, therapy discontinuation based on time did not differ the risk (p=0.24; I=0%; Z-score = 1.17).
The meta-analysis shows that alarm therapy has a better response rate than desmopressin in proactive parents. However, desmopressin may be an option in the opposite subjects, and it is necessary to use structured strategies to optimize the treatment.
儿童常见问题之一是单症状性夜间遗尿症(MNE)。MNE 是指在夜间睡眠中无意识地排尿,而没有下尿路症状,如白天尿频、失禁或尿急。警报疗法和去氨加压素已被用于治疗 MNE,但两种方法的疗效尚无明确比较。
本研究旨在比较警报疗法和去氨加压素的疗效,并探讨改善治疗效果的策略。
研究人员在 2010 年至 2021 年期间在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 上进行了研究检索。使用的关键词包括去氨加压素、警报疗法、儿科和单症状性遗尿症。该研究纳入了一项英文 RCT,且无研究对象脱落。未明确列出研究对象数量的研究被排除在外。
共有 12 项研究纳入荟萃分析,其中 9 项研究旨在寻找反应率,3 项研究针对去氨加压素停药优化策略。在动机强烈的父母和患者中,警报疗法优于去氨加压素(p=0.02),低异质性人群的合并风险比为 1.10(Z 评分=2.31;I=32%)。一种可以降低去氨加压素停药风险的策略是逐步减少剂量,而不是突然减少剂量(p=0.001;I=0%;Z 评分=3.26)。然而,基于时间的治疗中止并未改变风险(p=0.24;I=0%;Z 评分=1.17)。
荟萃分析表明,在积极主动的父母中,警报疗法的反应率优于去氨加压素。然而,对于相反的患者,去氨加压素可能是一种选择,有必要使用结构化策略来优化治疗。