Ahmed Abul-Fotouh Abdel-Maguid, Amin Moamen Mohammed, Ali Mahmoud Mohammed, Shalaby Essam Abdel-Moneim
Department of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. ; Department of Urology, Salman Bin Abdul-Aziz University, Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Korean J Urol. 2013 Nov;54(11):783-90. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.783. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
We evaluated and compared the effectiveness of an enuresis alarm, desmopressin medication, and their combination in the treatment of Saudi children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE).
A total of 136 children with PMNE were randomly assigned to receive an enuresis alarm alone (EA group, n=45), desmopressin alone (D group, n=46), or a combination of both (EA/D group, n=45). Patients were followed weekly during treatment and for 12 weeks after treatment withdrawal.
During treatment, wetting frequencies were significantly reduced in all groups and remained significantly lower than pretreatment values until the end of follow-up. In the D and EA/D groups, an immediate reduction in wetting frequencies was observed, whereas a longer time was required to reach a significant reduction in the EA group. The full and partial response rates were 13.3% and 37.8% in the EA group, 26.1% and 43.5% in the D group, and 40.0% and 33.3% in the EA/D group. A significant difference was observed only between the EA and EA/D groups (p=0.025). Relapse rates were higher in the D group (66.6%) than in the EA (16.6%) and EA/D (33.3%) groups. A significant difference was observed between the D and EA groups only (p=0.019).
Desmopressin, an enuresis alarm, and combined therapy are effective in the treatment of Saudi children with PMNE. Desmopressin produced an immediate effect but relapses were common. The enuresis alarm provided gradual effects that persisted posttreatment. The combined therapy was superior to the alarm in achieving an immediate response; however, its effect was not better than that of the alarm long term.
我们评估并比较了遗尿报警器、去氨加压素药物及其联合使用对沙特原发性单纯性夜间遗尿(PMNE)儿童的治疗效果。
总共136例PMNE儿童被随机分配,分别单独接受遗尿报警器治疗(EA组,n = 45)、单独接受去氨加压素治疗(D组,n = 46)或两者联合治疗(EA/D组,n = 45)。治疗期间每周对患者进行随访,治疗结束停药后随访12周。
治疗期间,所有组的尿床频率均显著降低,且在随访结束前一直显著低于治疗前水平。在D组和EA/D组中,尿床频率立即降低,而EA组则需要更长时间才能显著降低。EA组的完全缓解率和部分缓解率分别为13.3%和37.8%,D组为26.1%和43.5%,EA/D组为40.0%和33.3%。仅在EA组和EA/D组之间观察到显著差异(p = 0.025)。D组的复发率(66.6%)高于EA组(16.6%)和EA/D组(33.3%)。仅在D组和EA组之间观察到显著差异(p = 0.019)。
去氨加压素、遗尿报警器及联合治疗对沙特PMNE儿童有效。去氨加压素起效迅速,但复发常见。遗尿报警器效果逐渐显现且治疗后仍持续存在。联合治疗在实现即时反应方面优于报警器;然而,从长期来看,其效果并不比报警器更好。