J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2021 Dec;69(6):1163-1190. doi: 10.1177/00030651211067241.
Authority and freedom are connected, and both have external and internal forms. External authority, political or institutional, can impinge on internal freedom in ways that matter to psychoanalysts. Internal freedom requires an internal authority that can be trusted. The superego is an external authority masquerading as an internal one. The ego, with its compliance toward the id, the superego, and external reality, operates like a false self in the psyche. In Lacanian terms, it is of necessity alienated from itself. By contrast, the true self as described by Winnicott, and the "subject" as theorized especially in French psychoanalysis, represent an authentic conscience that allows us to become the authors of our at one's authority. This implies two sorts of freedom: freedom from narcissistic self-investment, and the forward-looking freedom of psychic growth. The latter occurs only in a context of relatedness to others, and it entails caring for the interests of others-if necessary at one's own expense. This vision of human beings as having an innate impetus toward psychic growth makes psychoanalysis a fundamentally optimistic endeavor. Clinical and nonclinical examples show, however, that it demands a perpetual readiness to let go of apparent certainties.
权威和自由是相互关联的,它们都有外在和内在的形式。外在的权威,无论是政治的还是制度的,都可能以对精神分析学家重要的方式侵犯内在的自由。内在的自由需要一个可以信赖的内在权威。超我是一种伪装成内在权威的外在权威。自我,带着它对本我、超我和外部现实的顺从,在心理中表现得像一个虚假的自我。用拉康的术语来说,它必然与自身疏离。相比之下,温尼科特所描述的真实自我,以及法国精神分析学特别提出的“主体”,代表了一种真实的良知,使我们能够成为自己权威的作者。这意味着两种自由:摆脱自恋性自我投入的自由,以及心理成长的前瞻性自由。后者仅在与他人相关的背景下发生,它需要关心他人的利益——如果有必要,甚至不惜牺牲自己的利益。这种将人类视为具有内在心理成长动力的观点使精神分析成为一种从根本上乐观的努力。临床和非临床的例子表明,它要求人们时刻准备好放弃表面上的确定性。