Alsubaie Hemail M, Almosa Wedyan H, Al-Qahtani Ali S, Margalani Osama
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2021 Dec 17;12:21526567211058052. doi: 10.1177/21526567211058052. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Choanal Atresia is an obliteration by an atretic plate of the posterior choanae due to a failure of the bucconasal membrane to rupture. The insertion of stents post choanal atresia repair is familiar. Still, there are limited studies in the literature that specify the time to remove it, the best materials, and the effectiveness of each kind.
Our study aims to compare different types of choanal atresia stents and flaps and the outcome of different kinds of stents and flaps that use post-operatively. Also, to assess the risk of restenosis post-operatively with varying types of Stent and flaps.
A systematic review via databases for different types of stents and flaps used in choanal atresia, including 31 studies with precise technique, variety of stents, restenosis rates, and risk factors (unilaterality, the component of the atretic plate). And about 10 different approaches to flaps reconstruction were mentioned.
According to the data, we observed a successful rate of choanal atresia repair by using the ordinary ETT post-operatively ranged from 28 to 94.2%, which could be explained due to many factors. Post-operative Instructions on care and suctioning provided a good impact. Other types of stents found in case series like steroid eluting stents, Nelaton catheters, Silastic stents, or modified ETT have a promising future during 26 to 39 weeks follow-up. Still, they need further studies with randomization and more data. Flaps with different approaches and techniques showed promising results and fewer complication rates with or without stents, also now have been used in practice providing suitable alternatives for stents.
The original types of choanal atresia stents were shown to have a wide variety of results, while innovative materials of stents showed promising results, however, in relatively small case studies. Flaps were now used in practice giving other choices for stents with fewer complications, better healing, and new choana formation.
后鼻孔闭锁是由于鼻颊膜未能破裂,后鼻孔被闭锁板闭塞。后鼻孔闭锁修复术后放置支架是常见的做法。然而,文献中关于取出支架的时间、最佳材料以及每种材料的有效性的研究有限。
我们的研究旨在比较不同类型的后鼻孔闭锁支架和皮瓣,以及术后使用不同种类支架和皮瓣的结果。此外,评估不同类型的支架和皮瓣术后再狭窄的风险。
通过数据库对后鼻孔闭锁中使用的不同类型的支架和皮瓣进行系统评价,包括31项具有精确技术、各种支架、再狭窄率和危险因素(单侧性、闭锁板成分)的研究。并提及了约10种不同的皮瓣重建方法。
根据数据,我们观察到术后使用普通气管内导管进行后鼻孔闭锁修复的成功率在28%至94.2%之间,这可能由多种因素导致。术后的护理和吸引指导产生了良好影响。在病例系列中发现的其他类型的支架,如类固醇洗脱支架、内拉通导管、硅橡胶支架或改良气管内导管,在26至39周的随访期间前景良好。不过,它们需要进一步的随机研究和更多数据。采用不同方法和技术的皮瓣显示出良好的结果,无论有无支架,并发症发生率都较低,目前也已在实践中使用,为支架提供了合适的替代方案。
原始类型的后鼻孔闭锁支架显示出各种各样的结果,而创新的支架材料显示出有前景的结果,然而,这些研究多为相对较小的病例研究。皮瓣目前已在实践中使用,为支架提供了其他选择,并发症更少、愈合更好且能形成新的后鼻孔。