• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种新型机械压迫装置在预防 CIED 植入后血肿和伤口美容方面的效果。

Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Department of Cardiology, William Beaumont Oakland University School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr;45(4):491-498. doi: 10.1111/pace.14454. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1111/pace.14454
PMID:35174901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9310802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An important complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation is the development of hematoma and device infection.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and cosmetic outcomes following CIED implantation.

METHODS

An open, prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial was performed in patients undergoing CIED implantation. Patients were randomized to receive a novel mechanical compression device (PressRite, PR) or to receive the standard of care post device implantation. Skin pliability was measured with a calibrated durometer; the surgical site was evaluated using the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) by a blinded plastic surgeon and the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS). Performance of PR was assessed through pressure measurements, standardized scar scales and tolerability.

RESULTS

From the total of 114 patients evaluated for enrollment, 105 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty-one patients were randomized to management group (PR) and 54 to the control group. No patients required early removal or experienced adverse effects from PR application. There were 11 hematomas (14.8% vs. 5.9% in the control and PR group respectively, p = NS). The control group had higher post procedure durometer readings in the surgical site when compared with the PR group (7.50 ± 3.45 vs. 5.37 ± 2.78; p = < .01). There were lower MSS scores in the PR group after 2 weeks (p = .03).

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated the safety of PR application and removal. In addition, PR appears to improve postoperative skin pliability, which could facilitate wound healing.

摘要

背景

心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)植入后的一个重要并发症是血肿和设备感染的发生。

目的

我们旨在评估一种新型机械压迫装置在预防 CIED 植入后血肿和改善美容效果方面的应用。

方法

这是一项在接受 CIED 植入的患者中进行的开放性、前瞻性、随机、单中心临床试验。患者被随机分配接受新型机械压迫装置(PressRite,PR)或在设备植入后接受标准护理。使用校准的硬度计测量皮肤柔韧性;由一位盲法整形医生使用曼彻斯特瘢痕量表(MSS)和患者和观察者瘢痕量表(POSAS)对手术部位进行评估。通过压力测量、标准化瘢痕量表和可耐受性来评估 PR 的性能。

结果

在总共评估了 114 名符合入组条件的患者中,有 105 名患者符合分析条件。51 名患者被随机分配到管理组(PR),54 名患者分到对照组。没有患者需要早期移除或因 PR 应用而出现不良反应。血肿发生率为 11 例(分别为 14.8%和 5.9%,对照组和 PR 组之间无统计学差异,p=NS)。与 PR 组相比,对照组在术后术区的硬度计读数更高(7.50 ± 3.45 与 5.37 ± 2.78;p <.01)。PR 组在 2 周后 MSS 评分较低(p =.03)。

结论

我们已经证明了 PR 应用和移除的安全性。此外,PR 似乎可以改善术后皮肤柔韧性,这有助于伤口愈合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/140db221a926/PACE-45-491-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/6934f3c78ec4/PACE-45-491-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/8ada369f2343/PACE-45-491-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/7981974c952c/PACE-45-491-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/140db221a926/PACE-45-491-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/6934f3c78ec4/PACE-45-491-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/8ada369f2343/PACE-45-491-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/7981974c952c/PACE-45-491-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c62e/9310802/140db221a926/PACE-45-491-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a novel mechanical compression device for hematoma prevention and wound cosmesis after CIED implantation.评估一种新型机械压迫装置在预防 CIED 植入后血肿和伤口美容方面的效果。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr;45(4):491-498. doi: 10.1111/pace.14454. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Effect of a pocket compression device on hematomas, skin reactions, and comfort in patients receiving a cardiovascular implantable electronic device: a randomized controlled trial.口袋压迫装置对接受心血管植入式电子装置患者血肿、皮肤反应和舒适度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;63(2):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00973-5. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation.心脏设备植入后的基线切口特征和早期瘢痕成熟指标
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jan 19;37(2):400-406. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12464. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Pocket related complications following cardiac electronic device implantation in patients receiving anticoagulation and/or dual antiplatelet therapy: prospective evaluation of different preventive strategies.接受抗凝和/或双联抗血小板治疗的患者植入心脏电子设备后与囊袋相关的并发症:不同预防策略的前瞻性评估
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;54(3):247-255. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0488-y. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
5
Device implantation for patients on antiplatelets and anticoagulants: Use of suction drain.接受抗血小板和抗凝治疗患者的设备植入:引流管的使用
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S389-S393. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
6
Current strategies to minimize postoperative hematoma formation in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A review.当前减少接受心脏植入式电子设备植入术患者术后血肿形成的策略:综述。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Apr;18(4):641-650. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
7
Use of a pocket compression device for the prevention and treatment of pocket hematoma after pacemaker and defibrillator implantation (STOP-HEMATOMA-I).使用口袋式压迫装置预防和治疗起搏器及除颤器植入术后的口袋血肿(STOP-HEMATOMA-I)。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;49(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0235-9. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
8
Local gentamicin-collagen sponge reduces cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and pocket hematoma.局部应用庆大霉素-明胶海绵可降低心血管植入式电子设备感染和囊袋血肿的发生率。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Jul;26(14):5218-5224. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202207_29311.
9
Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Treatment in Early Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection.早期心脏植入式电子设备感染的抗生素预防和治疗。
Med Arch. 2021 Feb;75(1):56-60. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.56-60.
10
Cardiac implantable electronic device hematomas: Risk factors and effect of prophylactic pressure bandaging.心脏植入式电子设备血肿:危险因素及预防性加压包扎的效果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jul;40(7):857-867. doi: 10.1111/pace.13106. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation.心脏设备植入后的基线切口特征和早期瘢痕成熟指标
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jan 19;37(2):400-406. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12464. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Current strategies to minimize postoperative hematoma formation in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A review.当前减少接受心脏植入式电子设备植入术患者术后血肿形成的策略:综述。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Apr;18(4):641-650. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence.
新冠疫情期间远程医疗的作用:基于现有证据的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4.
4
The relationship between pocket hematoma and risk of wound infection among patients with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device: An integrative review.口袋血肿与心血管植入式电子设备患者伤口感染风险的关系:综合评价。
Heart Lung. 2020 Jan-Feb;49(1):92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.经静脉导线拔除:当前方法与未来趋势。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018 Aug;7(3):210-217. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.33.2.
6
New Insights into Predictors of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection.心脏植入式电子设备感染预测因素的新见解
Tex Heart Inst J. 2018 Jun 1;45(3):128-135. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-17-6300. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.高危患者的心脏植入式电子设备感染
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 May;5(1):65-71. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.27.2.
8
Clinically Significant Pocket Hematoma Increases Long-Term Risk of Device Infection: BRUISE CONTROL INFECTION Study.临床显著的囊袋血肿会增加器械感染的长期风险:BRUISE CONTROL INFECTION 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 22;67(11):1300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.009.
9
Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.客观颜色测量:三种设备在正常皮肤和瘢痕组织上的临床测量性能。
J Burn Care Res. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):e187-94. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318264bf7d.
10
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device associated infections.心血管植入电子设备相关感染。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;26(1):57-76. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.001.