Papaspyridakos Panos, AlFulaij Fahad, Bokhary Abdullah, Sallustio Anthony, Chochlidakis Konstantinos
Department of Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA.
Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan;32(1):49-53. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13492. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
To assess the accuracy of a complete digital workflow protocol for fabrication of printed prosthesis prototypes for maxillary immediate loading treatment.
A maxillary stone cast with 4 abutment-level implant analogs with adequate antero-posterior spread was fabricated. This stone cast served as a reference cast and a zirconia prosthesis was also fabricated to serve as an interim prosthesis. Double digital scanning was used for digital scans of the reference cast and the interim prosthesis, respectively. An intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3) was used to capture the standard tessellation language (STL) files. These STL files were then imported to computer-aided design (CAD) software (Exocad DentalCAD) and superimposed into a final design STL file that was exported to 3 different (Form 3b+, Carbon M2, Sprintray Pro95) three-dimensional (3D) printers to produce a total of 90 printed prototypes (n = 30 from each 3D printer). Two blinded clinicians assessed the accuracy of fit of each digitally fabricated prosthesis prototype on the reference cast, utilizing the screw-resistance test and radiographs. The Fisher's exact test was used to test the difference between the groups.
Out of the 90 digitally fabricated prototypes, 86 (95.6%) presented with accurate fit. The accuracy of fit ranged from 87% (26/30) for Sprintray Pro95 to 100% (30/30) for the Form 3b+ and M2 Carbon groups.
Digitally fabricated prosthesis prototypes can be generated with a complete digital workflow leading to clinically acceptable fit, while reducing the number of appointments and treatment time. The 3D printer had an effect on the accuracy of prosthesis prototype fit.
评估用于上颌即刻负重治疗的打印假体原型制作的完整数字工作流程协议的准确性。
制作一个带有4个具有足够前后扩展的基台水平种植体代型的上颌石膏模型。该石膏模型用作参考模型,还制作了一个氧化锆假体用作临时假体。分别对参考模型和临时假体进行双数字扫描。使用口腔内扫描仪(TRIOS 3)获取标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件。然后将这些STL文件导入计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件(Exocad DentalCAD),并叠加到最终设计的STL文件中,该文件被导出到3种不同的(Form 3b +、Carbon M2、Sprintray Pro95)三维(3D)打印机中,以制作总共90个打印原型(每种3D打印机各30个)。两名不知情的临床医生利用螺丝阻力测试和X线片评估每个数字制作的假体原型在参考模型上的贴合准确性。采用Fisher精确检验来测试组间差异。
在90个数字制作的原型中,86个(95.6%)贴合准确。贴合准确性范围从Sprintray Pro95的87%(26/30)到Form 3b +组和M2 Carbon组的100%(30/30)。
通过完整的数字工作流程可以生成数字制作的假体原型,从而获得临床上可接受的贴合度,同时减少就诊次数和治疗时间。3D打印机会影响假体原型的贴合准确性。