School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Mar;99:103297. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103297. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
It is well documented that reaches are adapted when reaching with a visuomotor distortion (i.e., rotated cursor feedback). Less clear is the influence of awareness on visuomotor adaptation, where awareness encompasses knowledge of the changes in one's reaches and the visuomotor distortion itself. In the current experiment, we asked if awareness governs the magnitude of implicit (i.e., unconscious) visuomotor adaptation achieved, independent of how the distortion is introduced (i.e., abruptly vs. gradually introduced visuomotor distortion), and hence initial errors experienced. Participants were divided into two groups that differed with respect to how the visuomotor distortion was introduced (i.e., Abrupt vs. Gradual Groups) and reached in a virtual environment where a cursor on the screen misrepresented the position of their hand. Participants completed three blocks of 150 reach training trials in the following order: aligned cursor feedback (baseline), rotated cursor feedback (adaptation) and aligned cursor feedback (washout). For the Abrupt Group, the cursor was immediately rotated 45° clockwise (CW) relative to hand motion in the adaptation block, whereas in the Gradual Group, the 45° cursor rotation was gradually introduced over adaptation trials. Following reach training, participants' awareness of changes in their reaches and the visuomotor distortion were established based on a drawing task, where participants drew the path their hand took to get the cursor on target, as well as a post-experiment questionnaire. Participants were subsequently divided into the following 3 groups: Abrupt-Aware (n = 16), Gradual-Aware (n = 11) and Gradual-Unaware (n = 14). Results revealed that errors differed for the Gradual-Unaware Group at the end of adaptation training compared to the Gradual-Aware Group and at the start of the washout block compared to the Abrupt-Aware Group. Errors in the two aware groups did not differ from each other. These results suggest that awareness may lead to reduced implicit adaptation, regardless of the size of initial errors experienced.
已有大量文献证明,在进行视觉运动扭曲(即旋转光标反馈)的伸手动作时,伸手动作会发生适应性改变。但对于视觉运动适应中意识的影响,目前还不太清楚,意识包含了对自身伸手动作变化和视觉运动扭曲本身的了解。在当前的实验中,我们想知道意识是否控制了无意识的(即无意识的)视觉运动适应的程度,而与扭曲的引入方式(即突然引入与逐渐引入视觉运动扭曲)无关,也与初始误差无关。参与者被分为两组,这两组在视觉运动扭曲的引入方式(即突然引入与逐渐引入组)和在虚拟环境中的伸手动作上有所不同,在虚拟环境中,屏幕上的光标代表他们手的位置。参与者在以下顺序完成了三回合 150 次伸手训练试验:光标对齐反馈(基线)、光标旋转反馈(适应)和光标对齐反馈(洗脱)。对于突然引入组,在适应阶段,光标相对于手部运动立即顺时针(CW)旋转 45°,而在逐渐引入组中,45°的光标旋转逐渐引入适应试验。在伸手训练后,根据绘图任务确定参与者对伸手动作变化和视觉运动扭曲的意识,参与者需要绘制出手部移动到光标对准目标的路径,以及一份实验后问卷。随后,参与者被分为以下三组:突然引入意识组(n=16)、逐渐引入意识组(n=11)和逐渐引入无意识组(n=14)。结果显示,与逐渐引入意识组相比,在适应训练结束时,逐渐引入无意识组的误差较大,而在洗脱阶段开始时,与突然引入意识组的误差较大。两个意识组之间的误差没有差异。这些结果表明,无论初始误差的大小如何,意识都可能导致无意识适应减少。