Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Assiut University Hospital, Asyut, Egypt.
Surg Technol Int. 2022 May 19;40:263-270. doi: 10.52198/22.STI.40.CV1542.
Endovascular treatment options of aorto-iliac occlusive disease have emerged, leading to better outcomes in more complex pathology, which typically involves a reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation. The Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation (CERAB) configuration was introduced in 2013, in an attempt to optimize outcomes, when compared to the kissing stent configuration, which was traditionally the preferred endovascular technique for this pathology. CERAB aims to optimize geometry, and with that the arterial flow patterns that are associated with loss of patency. In CERAB, the aortic bifurcation is reconstructed using three balloon-expandable covered stents in a tight connection with each other and with an appropriate wall apposition, thereby minimizing geometrical mismatch (Fig. 1a-c). The reconstruction can be extended on both sides and could be combined with chimney, or parallel, grafts in aortic side branches that need to be preserved. In the current paper, the details of the CERAB technique are described and supported by evidence derived from pre-clinical studies that confirm the more optimal geometry and flow patterns compared to kissing stents. Also, a summary is provided of published clinical evidence, including technical and clinical outcomes of the technique. These data show promising early results, with patency rates in line with those achieved with open surgery, also in patients with extensive disease. Finally, the potential modes of failures and future developments are discussed.
腔内治疗选择的出现了,导致更好的结果在更复杂的病理,通常涉及重建主动脉分叉。被覆盖的腔内重建主动脉分叉(CERAB)配置在 2013 年被引入,试图优化结果,与吻支架配置相比,这是传统上这种病理学的首选腔内技术。CERAB 的目的是优化几何形状,并优化与通畅性丧失相关的动脉血流模式。在 CERAB 中,使用三个球囊扩张的覆膜支架在紧密连接彼此和适当的壁贴合,从而最小化几何不匹配(图 1a-c)。重建可以在两侧进行,并可与烟囱或平行移植相结合,需要保留在主动脉侧支。在目前的论文中,详细描述了 CERAB 技术,并通过临床前研究获得的证据支持,这些证据证实了与吻支架相比,该技术具有更优化的几何形状和血流模式。此外,还提供了该技术的已发表临床证据的摘要,包括技术和临床结果。这些数据显示了有希望的早期结果,通畅率与开放手术相当,在广泛疾病的患者中也是如此。最后,讨论了潜在的失败模式和未来的发展。