• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先前的急诊剖宫产是复发性自发性早产的一个风险因素;一项回顾性队列研究。

Previous term emergency caesarean section is a risk factor for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth; a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:108-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.008
PMID:35182999
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Emergency caesarean sections (EmCS), particularly those performed in the second stage of labour, have been associated with a risk of subsequent preterm birth. More worrying is that the risk of sPTB recurrence appears to be high in women who have had a second stage EmCS and a subsequent sPTB. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the risk of recurrence in women who have had a prior term EmCS at any stage of labour followed by a sPTB. This study aims to investigate the relationship between all term in labour EmCS and the risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).

STUDY DESIGN

This is an observational, retrospective cohort study conducted at St Thomas' Hospital, a tertiary-level maternity hospital in London, United Kingdom. 259 women were included; 59 women with a term in labour EmCS preceding a sPTB (EmCS group) and 200 women with a prior sPTB only (control group). The initial EmCS was further categorised into first stage (FS)-EmCS or second stage (SS)-EmCS. Primary outcome was sPTB in Pregnancy C < 37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included sPTB < 34 weeks' and < 24 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

54% (32/59) of the EmCS group had a recurrent sPTB < 37 weeks compared to 20% (40/200) of the control women (p < 0.0001) with a relative risk of 2.71 [95%CI 1.87-3.87]). Of women who had a SS-EmCS and a subsequent PTB, 61.9% (13/21) had a further sPTB (RR 3.0 [95%CI, 1.8-4.5] compared to control women). In addition, there is nearly a 6-fold increased risk of a recurrent sPTB or midtrimester loss < 24 weeks' gestation in these women (RR 5.65 [95%CI2.6-12.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

In women who have had a previous sPTB in which a term in labour EmCS is a risk factor, the risk of a further sPTB is much higher than in those women where a prior sPTB is the sole risk factor. Furthermore, EmCS at both the first and second stage of labour are associated with a increased risk of recurrent sPTB. Further work should ascertain which women who have had a prior term EmCS are at risk of sPTB and recurrence, and how best to identify and treat them.

摘要

目的

紧急剖宫产术(EmCS),尤其是在第二产程进行的剖宫产术,与随后发生早产的风险有关。更令人担忧的是,在经历第二产程 EmCS 和随后发生早产的妇女中,sPTB 复发的风险似乎很高。然而,对于在分娩任何阶段经历过一次足月 EmCS 随后发生 sPTB 的妇女,复发风险的证据很少。本研究旨在调查所有分娩时的 EmCS 与复发性自发性早产(sPTB)风险之间的关系。

研究设计

这是一项在英国伦敦圣托马斯医院进行的观察性、回顾性队列研究。共纳入 259 名妇女,其中 59 名妇女在发生 sPTB 之前经历过足月 EmCS(EmCS 组),200 名妇女仅发生过 sPTB(对照组)。最初的 EmCS 进一步分为第一产程(FS)-EmCS 或第二产程(SS)-EmCS。主要结局是妊娠 C 期<37 周的 sPTB。次要结局包括 sPTB<34 周和 sPTB<24 周。

结果

EmCS 组中有 54%(32/59)的妇女再次发生 sPTB<37 周,而对照组中仅有 20%(40/200)的妇女(p<0.0001),相对风险为 2.71[95%CI 1.87-3.87])。在经历过 SS-EmCS 且随后发生 PTB 的妇女中,61.9%(13/21)发生了进一步的 sPTB(RR 3.0[95%CI,1.8-4.5]与对照组妇女相比)。此外,这些妇女再次发生 sPTB 或孕中期损失<24 周的风险增加近 6 倍(RR 5.65[95%CI 2.6-12.0])。

结论

在经历过先前 sPTB 的妇女中,分娩时的 EmCS 是一个危险因素,与仅存在先前 sPTB 为危险因素的妇女相比,进一步发生 sPTB 的风险要高得多。此外,第一产程和第二产程的 EmCS 都与复发性 sPTB 的风险增加有关。进一步的工作应该确定哪些经历过先前足月 EmCS 的妇女有发生 sPTB 和复发的风险,以及如何最好地识别和治疗她们。

相似文献

1
Previous term emergency caesarean section is a risk factor for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth; a retrospective cohort study.先前的急诊剖宫产是复发性自发性早产的一个风险因素;一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:108-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
2
Efficacy of transvaginal cervical cerclage in women at risk of preterm birth following previous emergency cesarean section.经阴道宫颈环扎术在有剖宫产史的早产高危孕妇中的疗效。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov;99(11):1486-1491. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13972. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Prior term delivery increases risk of subsequent recurrent preterm birth: An unexpected finding.先前的早产增加了随后再次早产的风险:一个意外的发现。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;62(4):500-505. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13504. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
4
Duration of the second stage of labour and risk of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth.第二产程持续时间与随后自发性早产风险的关系。
BJOG. 2022 Sep;129(10):1743-1749. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17102. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
5
Full dilation cesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth.完全扩张剖宫产:孕中期复发性流产和早产的一个风险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Sep;96(9):1100-1105. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13160. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
6
Does the length of second stage of labour or second stage caesarean section in nulliparous women increase the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies?初产妇第二产程的时长或剖宫产第二产程会增加其后续妊娠早产的风险吗?
J Perinat Med. 2020 Sep 14;49(2):159-165. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0269. Print 2021 Feb 23.
7
Length of second stage of labor and preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy.第二产程时长与后续妊娠中的早产
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):535.e1-535.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.919. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
8
Caesarean birth and risk of subsequent preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.剖宫产分娩与随后早产风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 May;128(6):1020-1028. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16566. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
9
Does previous caesarean section at full dilatation increase the likelihood of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth?足月时既往剖宫产会增加随后自然早产的可能性吗?
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jun;58(3):267-273. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12713. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.复发性自发性早产的风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 5;7(6):e015402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015402.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Birth in a Subsequent Pregnancy After Full Dilatation Caesarean Birth: A Nationwide Cohort Study.足月剖宫产术后再次妊娠时自然早产的风险:一项全国性队列研究。
BJOG. 2025 Oct;132(11):1585-1593. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18225. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Escalating caesarean deliveries and the impact on subsequent preterm birth.剖宫产率不断上升及其对后续早产的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 Apr 26;26:100391. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100391. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Cervical cesarean damage as a growing clinical problem: The association between in-labour cesarean section and recurrent preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies.
宫颈剖宫产损伤作为一个日益严重的临床问题:产时剖宫产与后续妊娠中复发性早产之间的关联。
PLoS Med. 2024 Dec 12;21(12):e1004497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004497. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Models for the Risk of Emergency Caesarean Births.急诊剖宫产风险临床预测模型的系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):231-240. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17948. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Outcomes following elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance in women with one prior preterm event.有一次早产史的女性选择性宫颈环扎术与超声监测的结局比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Nov;290:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 3.