Department of Anesthesiology, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01589-6.
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has a pharmacological profile that should allow rapid recovery and prevent undesirable outcomes such as pulmonary complications.
This large retrospective study compared the beneficial effects of perioperative infusion of DEX with propofol on the postoperative outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. We reviewed patients' medical notes at Luoyang Central Hospital from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2019. All continuous variables, if normally distributed, were presented as mean ± SD; Otherwise, the non-normally distributed data and categorical data were presented as median (25-75 IQR) or number (percentage). The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the difference of variables between the DEX and propofol groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the main related and differential factors in the perioperative period.
A total of 1388 patients were included in the study; of those, 557 patients received propofol infusion, and 831 patients received dexmedetomidine. DEX significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications compared with propofol, 7.82% vs 13.29%; P < 0.01, respectively. When compared with propofol, DEX significantly shortened the duration of mechanical lung ventilation, 18 (13,25) hours vs 21 (16,37) hours; P < 0.001, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, 51 (42,90) vs 59 (46,94.5) hours; P = 0.001 and hospital stay, 20 (17,24) vs 22 (17,28) days; P < 0.001, respectively. The incidences of postoperative wound dehiscence and infection were significantly reduced with DEX compared with propofol groups, 2.53% vs 6.64%; P < 0.001, respectively. Interestingly, patients receiving DEX had significantly shorter surgical time compared to propofol; 275 (240,310) vs 280 (250,320) minutes respectively (P = 0.005) and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.001).
Perioperative infusion of dexmedetomidine improved the desirable outcomes in patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with propofol.
右美托咪定(DEX)具有药理学特性,可促进快速康复,并预防肺部并发症等不良后果。
本大型回顾性研究比较了围手术期输注 DEX 与丙泊酚对冠状动脉旁路移植手术后患者术后结局的有益影响。我们回顾了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日洛阳中心医院患者的病历。所有连续变量,若呈正态分布,则表示为均数±标准差;否则,非正态分布数据和分类数据表示为中位数(25-75 IQR)或数量(百分比)。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和卡方检验比较 DEX 组和丙泊酚组之间的变量差异。对围手术期主要相关和差异因素进行多因素 logistic 回归分析。
共纳入 1388 例患者;其中,557 例患者输注丙泊酚,831 例患者输注右美托咪定。DEX 可显著降低术后肺部并发症发生率,与丙泊酚相比为 7.82% vs 13.29%;P<0.01。与丙泊酚相比,DEX 可显著缩短机械通气时间,18(13,25)小时 vs 21(16,37)小时;P<0.001、重症监护病房停留时间,51(42,90)小时 vs 59(46,94.5)小时;P=0.001、住院时间,20(17,24)天 vs 22(17,28)天;P<0.001。DEX 组术后切口裂开和感染发生率明显低于丙泊酚组,分别为 2.53% vs 6.64%;P<0.001。有趣的是,与丙泊酚相比,接受 DEX 的患者手术时间明显缩短,分别为 275(240,310)分钟 vs 280(250,320)分钟(P=0.005),失血量也更少(P=0.001)。
与丙泊酚相比,围手术期输注右美托咪定可改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的预后。