• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部进展期直肠腺癌放化疗后挽救性内镜黏膜下剥离术的技术可行性。

Technical feasibility of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.014
PMID:35183541
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is chemoradiation (CRT) followed by proctectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is an emerging role for nonsurgical management after CRT or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) consisting of CRT and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) after CRT or TNT for rectal cancer, termed "salvage ESD," may be a viable nonsurgical option for carefully selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage ESD.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of cases of salvage ESD for locally advanced rectal cancer and standard ESD for rectal tumors without prior CRT from July 2018 to August 2020 at our institution was performed. Clinical factors and imaging, procedural, and pathology results were collected and compared.

RESULTS

Twelve salvage ESD cases were compared with 27 standard ESD cases. Before CRT, 83.3% of lesions in the salvage ESD group were initially clinically staged as T3. The en-bloc resection rates were 92.7% and 91.7% (P = 1.00) and R0 resection rates 66.7% and 75.0% (P = .55) for the standard and salvage groups, respectively. In the salvage ESD group, no adverse events were observed, and 75.0% of the adenocarcinomas in the salvage ESD group had morphologically changed to hyperplasia or adenoma after CRT, with no identifiable lesions greater than T1 tumor depth.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage ESD for locally advanced rectal cancer is technically feasible with low adverse event rates. There may be a diagnostic role in salvage ESD in assessing pathologic response to CRT and a possible therapeutic role in resection of residual lesions with the potential to avoid surgery.

摘要

背景与目的

局部晚期直肠癌的标准治疗方法是放化疗(CRT)后行直肠切除术和辅助化疗。然而,CRT 或新辅助放化疗(TNT)后行非手术治疗(包括 CRT 和新辅助化疗)的作用正在不断显现。直肠癌 CRT 或 TNT 后行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD),称为“挽救性 ESD”,可能是为精心挑选的患者提供的一种可行的非手术选择。我们旨在评估挽救性 ESD 的可行性和安全性。

方法

对 2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 8 月期间我院局部晚期直肠癌行挽救性 ESD 和无 CRT 前直肠肿瘤行标准 ESD 的病例进行回顾性图表分析。收集并比较了临床因素、影像学、手术过程和病理结果。

结果

比较了 12 例挽救性 ESD 病例和 27 例标准 ESD 病例。在 CRT 前,挽救性 ESD 组 83.3%的病变最初临床分期为 T3。整块切除率分别为 92.7%和 91.7%(P=1.00),R0 切除率分别为 66.7%和 75.0%(P=0.55)。挽救性 ESD 组无不良事件发生,挽救性 ESD 组中 75.0%的腺癌在 CRT 后形态学上转变为增生或腺瘤,无大于 T1 肿瘤深度的可识别病变。

结论

挽救性 ESD 治疗局部晚期直肠癌在技术上是可行的,不良事件发生率低。在评估 CRT 病理反应方面,挽救性 ESD 可能具有诊断作用,在切除可能避免手术的残留病变方面可能具有治疗作用。

相似文献

1
Technical feasibility of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.局部进展期直肠腺癌放化疗后挽救性内镜黏膜下剥离术的技术可行性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD): A novel approach to the local treatment of early rectal cancer.经肛门内镜微创手术下黏膜剥离术(TEM-ESD):一种治疗早期直肠癌的新方法。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;39:101662. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101662. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Endoscopic resection of residual rectal neoplasia after definitive chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.直肠癌根治性放化疗后残余直肠肿瘤的内镜下切除。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb;68:101896. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101896. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lower rectal tumors with hemorrhoids.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗合并痔疮的低位直肠肿瘤的可行性及安全性
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 21;22(27):6268-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6268.
5
Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD) for rectal adenomas: a retrospective cohort study of 145 consecutive cases.经肛门内镜显微外科黏膜下剥离术(TEM-ESD)治疗直肠腺瘤:145例连续病例的回顾性队列研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2423-2430. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02562-0. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal tumor.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与经肛门内镜显微手术治疗直肠肿瘤的疗效及安全性比较
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar-Apr;24(2):115-121. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_440_17.
7
[Application of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosa dissection to rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm].牙线牵引辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术在直肠神经内分泌肿瘤中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 25;22(4):377-382. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.04.011.
8
Long‑term prognosis and comprehensive endoscopic treatment strategy for esophageal cancer, including salvage endoscopic treatment after chemoradiation therapy.食管癌的长期预后及综合内镜治疗策略,包括放化疗后的挽救性内镜治疗。
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Feb 1;25(3):121. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11820. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for treatment of rectal tumors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)治疗直肠肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1688-1695. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06945-1. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
10
Stenosis rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection of large rectal tumors involving greater than three quarters of the luminal circumference.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗累及管腔周径超过四分之三的大型直肠肿瘤后的狭窄率。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5459-5464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4906-x. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Salvage endoscopic intermuscular dissection: curative treatment for residual rectal adenocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy.挽救性内镜下肌间剥离术:放化疗后残留直肠腺癌的根治性治疗
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E604-E605. doi: 10.1055/a-2598-5198. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
The Ongoing Development of Watch and Wait.“观察与等待”策略的持续发展
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Nov 4;38(4):290-300. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791722. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Endoscopic mesorectal dissection for precise rectal cancer staging: trespassing the boundaries of lumenal rectal interventions.
用于精确直肠癌分期的内镜下直肠系膜剥离术:突破腔内直肠干预的界限
VideoGIE. 2024 Oct 25;10(3):187-190. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.10.012. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Long-Term Follow-Up After Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastrointestinal Cancer-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.早期胃癌非根治性内镜下黏膜剥离术后的长期随访——一项回顾性多中心分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 2;13(21):6594. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216594.
5
Endoscopy First: The Best Choice to Optimize Outcomes for Early Gastrointestinal Malignancy.内镜优先:优化早期胃肠道恶性肿瘤治疗效果的最佳选择。
Visc Med. 2024 Jun;40(3):107-109. doi: 10.1159/000539178. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
6
Pattern of Residual Submucosal Involvement after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Rationale for the Utility of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection.直肠癌新辅助治疗后残留黏膜下浸润的模式:内镜黏膜下剥离术实用性的依据。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 11;59(10):1807. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101807.
7
Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection of a locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.窄带成像放大内镜检查及新辅助放化疗后局部进展期直肠腺癌的挽救性内镜黏膜下剥离术
Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(S 01):E587-E589. doi: 10.1055/a-2032-3646. Epub 2023 Mar 30.