Université Grenoble-Alpes, 2, rue des Jasmins, Meythet, 74960 Annecy, France.
Maison de Santé, 11, route du Villaret, 74120 Megève, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 May;108(3):103254. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103254. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
The clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is based on 3 tests: anterior drawer, pivot shift and Lachman. The latter is the most commonly used test. The "lever sign" is a new clinical test that was first described by Lelli et al. in 2014. The primary objective of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the lever sign test for the clinical diagnosis of ACL tears, in the primary care setting of patients with acute knee injuries. Primary care being the first point of contact between patients and the healthcare system (general practitioners in this study). The secondary objective was to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the lever sign test, by comparing it to the PPV of the Lachman test and its sensitivity. The working hypothesis was that the sensitivity of the lever sign test was equal to or greater than 80%.
This prospective cohort study included patients with ski-related knee injuries which occurred in French ski resorts between December 1, 2019, and March 15, 2020. The Lachman test and the lever sign test were performed by 36 mountain physicians and were compared to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The lever sign test involved placing a closed fist under the patient's calf in the supine position and applying downward pressure over the quadriceps. Depending on whether the ACL was intact or not, the patient's heel would either rise off the examination table or remain still. This study included 258 patients: 190 women and 68 men.
The MRIs found 219 ACL tears and 36 intact ACLs. Three MRIs were deemed uninterpretable. The sensitivity of the lever sign test was 61.2% and the PPV was 83.8%. The sensitivity of the Lachman test was 99.1% and the PPV was 86.5%.
This study determined the sensitivity of the lever sign test for the clinical diagnosis of ACL tears during real-life situations encountered by mountain physicians. This sensitivity was lower than expected. The Lachman test, on the other hand, showed a very high sensitivity. It remains the test of choice for the clinical diagnosis of ACL tears in patients with knee injuries. Therefore, the lever sign test can complement the Lachman test but is not a substitute for it.
II.
前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂的临床诊断基于 3 项测试:前抽屉试验、枢轴点移位试验和lachman 试验。lachman 试验是最常用的测试。“杠杆征”是一种新的临床测试,由 Lelli 等人于 2014 年首次描述。本研究的主要目的是确定杠杆征试验在初级保健环境中对急性膝关节损伤患者 ACL 撕裂的临床诊断的敏感性。初级保健是患者与医疗保健系统(本研究中的全科医生)的第一个接触点。次要目的是通过比较杠杆征试验与lachman 试验的阳性预测值(PPV)及其敏感性,计算杠杆征试验的阳性预测值(PPV)。工作假设是杠杆征试验的敏感性等于或大于 80%。
本前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 15 日在法国滑雪胜地发生的与滑雪相关的膝关节损伤患者。lachman 试验和杠杆征试验由 36 名山地医生进行,并与磁共振成像(MRI)结果进行比较。杠杆征试验包括在仰卧位时将患者小腿下的闭合拳头放在下面,并向下压股四头肌。根据 ACL 是否完整,患者的脚跟要么离开检查台,要么保持静止。本研究共纳入 258 例患者:190 例女性和 68 例男性。
MRI 发现 219 例 ACL 撕裂和 36 例 ACL 完整。3 例 MRI 结果无法解释。杠杆征试验的敏感性为 61.2%,阳性预测值为 83.8%。lachman 试验的敏感性为 99.1%,阳性预测值为 86.5%。
本研究确定了山地医生在现实生活中遇到的 ACL 撕裂的临床诊断中杠杆征试验的敏感性。这种敏感性低于预期。另一方面,lachman 试验显示出非常高的敏感性。它仍然是膝关节损伤患者 ACL 撕裂的首选临床诊断测试。因此,杠杆征试验可以补充lachman 试验,但不能替代它。
II 级。