Suppr超能文献

高级别神经胶质瘤的随访;DCE-MR 灌注鉴别治疗后强化和肿瘤强化。

Follow-Up of High-Grade Glial Tumor; Differentiation of Posttreatment Enhancement and Tumoral Enhancement by DCE-MR Perfusion.

机构信息

Bezmialem Vakif University, Department of Neurosurgery, İstanbul, Turkey.

Bezmialem Vakif University, Department of Radiology, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Feb 1;2022:6948422. doi: 10.1155/2022/6948422. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To search for the utility of DCE-MRP to differentiate between posttreatment enhancement (PT) and tumoral enhancement (TM) in high-grade glial tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with glioma (11 grade 3; 23 grade 4) were enrolled. Enhancement in the vicinity of the resection cavity demonstrated by DCE-MRP was taken into consideration. Based on the follow-up scans, reoperation or biopsy results, the enhancement type was categorized as PT or TM. Measurements were performed at the enhancing area near the resection cavity (ERC), nearby (NNA) and contralateral nonenhancing areas (CLNA). Perfusion parameters of the ERC were also subtracted from NNA and CLNA. Intragroup comparison (paired sample -test) and intergroup comparison (Student's -test) were made.

RESULTS

There were 7 PTs and 27 TMs. In the PT, the subtracted values of Ve and IAUC from the CLNA and NNA and the subtracted value of Kep from NNA were statistically different. In TM, all metrics were significantly different comparing the CLNA and NNA. Comparing PT with TM, Ktrans, IAUC, Kep, and subtracted values of Ktrans and IAUC from both NNA and CLNA were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In PT, only Ktrans values did not reveal any difference comparing NNA and CLNA. To differentiate PT from TM, Ktrans, Kep, IAUC, and subtracted values of Ktrans and IAUC from NNA and CLNA can be used. These findings are in concordance with literature.

摘要

目的

探讨动态对比增强磁共振灌注(DCE-MRP)在高级别胶质瘤术后强化(PT)与肿瘤性强化(TM)鉴别中的作用。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入 34 例脑胶质瘤患者(11 级 3 例,23 级 4 例)。对 DCE-MRP 显示的切除腔附近的强化进行了研究。根据随访扫描、再次手术或活检结果,将强化类型分为 PT 或 TM。在切除腔附近的强化区(ERC)、附近区域(NNA)和对侧无强化区(CLNA)进行测量。还从 NNA 和 CLNA 中减去 ERC 的灌注参数。进行组内比较(配对样本 t 检验)和组间比较(Student's t 检验)。

结果

PT 组有 7 例,TM 组有 27 例。在 PT 中,从 CLNA 和 NNA 中减去的 Ve 和 IAUC 值以及从 NNA 中减去的 Kep 值具有统计学差异。在 TM 中,CLNA 和 NNA 之间的所有指标均有显著差异。与 TM 相比,PT 组的 Ktrans、IAUC、Kep 和从 NNA 和 CLNA 中减去的 Ktrans 和 IAUC 值均有显著差异。

结论

在 PT 中,只有 Ktrans 值在 NNA 和 CLNA 之间没有差异。为了区分 PT 和 TM,可以使用 Ktrans、Kep、IAUC 和从 NNA 和 CLNA 中减去的 Ktrans 和 IAUC 值。这些发现与文献一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f7/8825574/ae22dcc22a99/CMMI2022-6948422.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验