Suppr超能文献

脑肿瘤的假性进展

Pseudoprogression of brain tumors.

作者信息

Thust Stefanie C, van den Bent Martin J, Smits Marion

机构信息

Lysholm Neuroradiology Department, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

Department of Brain Rehabilitation and Repair, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May 7;48(3):571-89. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26171.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This review describes the definition, incidence, clinical implications, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of pseudoprogression of brain tumors, in particular, but not limited to, high-grade glioma. Pseudoprogression is an important clinical problem after brain tumor treatment, interfering not only with day-to-day patient care but also the execution and interpretation of clinical trials. Radiologically, pseudoprogression is defined as a new or enlarging area(s) of contrast agent enhancement, in the absence of true tumor growth, which subsides or stabilizes without a change in therapy. The clinical definitions of pseudoprogression have been quite variable, which may explain some of the differences in reported incidences, which range from 9-30%. Conventional structural MRI is insufficient for distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progressive disease, and advanced imaging is needed to obtain higher levels of diagnostic certainty. Perfusion MRI is the most widely used imaging technique to diagnose pseudoprogression and has high reported diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic performance of MR spectroscopy (MRS) appears to be somewhat higher, but MRS is less suitable for the routine and universal application in brain tumor follow-up. The combination of MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging and/or perfusion MRI seems to be particularly powerful, with diagnostic accuracy reaching up to or even greater than 90%. While diagnostic performance can be high with appropriate implementation and interpretation, even a combination of techniques, however, does not provide 100% accuracy. It should also be noted that most studies to date are small, heterogeneous, and retrospective in nature. Future improvements in diagnostic accuracy can be expected with harmonization of acquisition and postprocessing, quantitative MRI and computer-aided diagnostic technology, and meticulous evaluation with clinical and pathological data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

摘要

未标注

本综述描述了脑肿瘤假性进展的定义、发生率、临床意义及磁共振成像(MRI)表现,尤其(但不限于)高级别胶质瘤。假性进展是脑肿瘤治疗后的一个重要临床问题,不仅干扰日常患者护理,还影响临床试验的实施与解读。在放射学上,假性进展定义为在无真正肿瘤生长的情况下出现的新的或扩大的对比剂强化区域,该区域在未改变治疗的情况下消退或稳定。假性进展的临床定义差异较大,这可能解释了报道的发生率在9%至30%之间存在差异的部分原因。传统的结构MRI不足以区分假性进展与真正的疾病进展,需要先进的成像技术以获得更高的诊断确定性。灌注MRI是诊断假性进展最广泛使用的成像技术,报道的诊断准确性较高。磁共振波谱(MRS)的诊断性能似乎略高,但MRS不太适合在脑肿瘤随访中常规普遍应用。MRS与扩散加权成像和/或灌注MRI的联合似乎特别有效,诊断准确性可达甚至超过90%。尽管通过适当的实施和解读,即使是技术联合,诊断性能也可能很高,但仍不能提供100%的准确性。还应注意,迄今为止的大多数研究规模小、异质性强且本质上是回顾性的。随着采集和后处理的标准化、定量MRI和计算机辅助诊断技术的发展,以及结合临床和病理数据进行细致评估,有望在未来提高诊断准确性。

证据水平

3 技术效能:2级 《磁共振成像杂志》2018年

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2b5/6175399/139f2b331c98/JMRI-48-571-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验