Okamoto M, Savageau M A
Biochemistry. 1986 Apr 22;25(8):1969-75. doi: 10.1021/bi00356a020.
Experimental measurements for isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase proofreading valyl-tRNAIle in Escherichia coli previously have been incorporated into the conventional Michaelis-Menten model for this system. This model was augmented to include two stages of proofreading--the aminoacyl adenylate and aminoacyl-tRNA stages--and used to predict the values of four additional rate constants that have been determined experimentally. The results suggest that two stages of conventional kinetic proofreading with binding sites designed for isoleucine (the "correct" substrate) are inconsistent with the experimental data, that a double-stage mechanism in which one stage (the "double-sieve") involves a binding site designed for valine (the "incorrect" substrate) and the other involves a binding site designed for isoleucine is consistent with all the experimental data, and that the experimental data are not sufficiently accurate to distinguish the stage at which the double-sieve mechanism operates in vivo. Furthermore, analysis of the model suggests that four parameters have the most questionable values and that experimental refinement of their estimates will be needed to determine which of the two stages involves the double-sieve mechanism.
先前已将大肠杆菌中异亮氨酰 - tRNA合成酶校对缬氨酰 - tRNAIle的实验测量结果纳入该系统的传统米氏模型。该模型得到扩充,纳入了校对的两个阶段——氨酰腺苷酸阶段和氨酰 - tRNA阶段——并用于预测另外四个已通过实验测定的速率常数的值。结果表明,针对异亮氨酸(“正确”底物)设计结合位点的传统动力学校对的两个阶段与实验数据不一致,一种双阶段机制,其中一个阶段(“双筛”)涉及针对缬氨酸(“错误”底物)设计的结合位点,另一个阶段涉及针对异亮氨酸设计的结合位点,与所有实验数据一致,并且实验数据的准确性不足以区分双筛机制在体内起作用的阶段。此外,对模型的分析表明,有四个参数的值最值得怀疑,需要对其估计值进行实验细化,以确定两个阶段中的哪一个涉及双筛机制。