Amemiya Shiori, Takei Naoyuki, Ueyama Tsuyoshi, Fujii Keita, Takao Hidemasa, Yasaka Koichiro, Watanabe Yusuke, Kamiya Kouhei, Abe Osamu
Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Sep;56(3):929-941. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28122. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
Nonenhanced MR angiography (MRA) studies are often used to manage acute and chronic large cervical artery disease, but lengthy scan times limit their clinical usefulness.
To develop an accelerated cervical MRA and test its diagnostic performance.
Prospective.
Patients with cervical artery disease (n = 32, 17 males).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T; accelerated two-point Dixon three-dimensional Cartesian spoiled gradient-echo (FLEXA) and conventional time-of-flight MRA (cMRA) sequences.
All patients underwent FLEXA (1'28″) and cMRA (6'47″) acquisitions. Quantitative evaluation (artery-to-background signal ratio and a blur metric) and qualitative evaluation using diagnostic performance measured by the sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), and vessel and plaque visualization scores from three board-certified radiologists' (with 10, 11, and 12 years of experience) independent readings using maximum intensity projection (MIP) for luminal diseases and axial images for plaque. The reference standards were contrast-enhanced angiography and fat-saturated T1-weighted images, respectively.
All measures were compared between FLEXA and cMRA using the paired t, Wilcoxon signed-rank, McNemar's, or chi-squared test, as appropriate. Interreader agreement was assessed using Cohen's κ. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The artery-to-background signal ratio was significantly higher for FLEXA (FLEXA: 7.20 ± 1.63 [fat]; 4.26 ± 0.52 [muscle]; cMRA: 2.57 ± 0.49 [fat]), while image blurring was significantly less (FLEXA: 0.24 ± 0.016; cMRA: 0.30 ± 0.029). In luminal disease detection, sensitivity (FLEXA: 0.97/0.91/0.91; cMRA:0.71/0.69/0.63), specificity (FLEXA: 0.98/0.93/0.98; cMRA:0.93/0.85/0.92), PPV (FLEXA: 0.92/0.86/0.86; cMRA: 0.64/0.5/0.58), and NPV (FLEXA: 0.99/0.98/0.98; cMRA: 0.92/0.91/0.9) were significantly higher for FLEXA. interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect for FLEXA (κ = 0.82/0.86/0.78) and moderate to substantial for cMRA (κ = 0.67/0.56/0.57). MIP visualization scores were significantly higher for FLEXA, with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement (FLEXA: κ = 0.83/0.86/0.82; cMRA: κ = 0.89/0.79/0.79). In plaque detection, sensitivity (FLEXA: 0.9/0.9/0.7; cMRA: 0.3/0.6/0.2) and specificity (FLEXA: 1/0.87/1; cMRA: 0.93/0.63/0.97) were significantly higher for FLEXA in two of three readers. The interreader plaque detection agreement was fair to substantial (FLEXA: κ = 0.63/0.69/0.48; cMRA: κ = 0.21/0.45/0.20). Side-by-side plaque and vessel wall visualization was superior for FLEXA in all readers, with moderate to substantial interreader agreement (plaque: κ = 0.73/0.73/0.77; vessel wall: κ = 0.57/0.40/0.39).
FLEXA enhanced visualization of the cervical arterial system and improved diagnostic performance for luminal abnormalities and plaques in patients with cervical artery diseases.
1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
非增强磁共振血管造影(MRA)研究常用于处理急慢性颈大动脉疾病,但扫描时间过长限制了其临床应用价值。
开发一种加速的颈部MRA并测试其诊断性能。
前瞻性研究。
颈动脉疾病患者(n = 32,男性17例)。
场强/序列:3.0T;加速两点狄克逊三维笛卡尔扰相梯度回波(FLEXA)序列和传统的时间飞跃MRA(cMRA)序列。
所有患者均接受FLEXA(1分28秒)和cMRA(6分47秒)采集。进行定量评估(动脉与背景信号比和模糊度指标)以及定性评估,定性评估采用由敏感度、特异度、阳性/阴性预测值(PPV/NPV)衡量的诊断性能,以及来自三位获得委员会认证的放射科医生(分别具有10年、11年和12年经验)独立阅片的血管和斑块可视化评分,对于管腔疾病使用最大强度投影(MIP),对于斑块使用轴位图像。参考标准分别为对比增强血管造影和脂肪饱和T1加权图像。
根据情况,使用配对t检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验、McNemar检验或卡方检验对FLEXA和cMRA之间的所有测量指标进行比较。使用Cohen's κ评估阅片者间一致性。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
FLEXA的动脉与背景信号比显著更高(FLEXA:脂肪7.20±1.63;肌肉4.26±0.52;cMRA:脂肪2.57±0.49),而图像模糊度显著更低(FLEXA:0.24±0.016;cMRA:0.30±0.029)。在管腔疾病检测中,FLEXA的敏感度(FLEXA:0.97/0.91/0.91;cMRA:0.71/0.69/0.63)、特异度(FLEXA:0.98/0.93/0.98;cMRA:0.93/0.85/0.92)、PPV(FLEXA:0.92/0.86/0.86;cMRA:0.64/0.5/0.58)和NPV(FLEXA:0.99/0.98/0.98;cMRA:0.92/0.91/0.9)显著更高。FLEXA的阅片者间一致性为实质性到几乎完美(κ = 0.82/0.86/0.78),cMRA为中等至实质性(κ = 0.67/0.56/0.57)。FLEXA的MIP可视化评分显著更高,阅片者间一致性为实质性到几乎完美(FLEXA:κ = 0.83/0.86/0.82;cMRA:κ = 0.89/0.79/0.79)。在斑块检测中,三位阅片者中有两位的FLEXA敏感度(FLEXA:0.9/0.9/0.7;cMRA:0.3/0.6/0.2)和特异度(FLEXA:1/0.87/1;cMRA:0.93/0.63/0.97)显著更高。阅片者间斑块检测一致性为一般到实质性(FLEXA:κ = 0.63/0.69/0.48;cMRA:κ = 0.21/0.45/0.20)。在所有阅片者中,FLEXA的斑块和血管壁并排可视化效果更好,阅片者间一致性为中等至实质性(斑块:κ = 0.73/0.73/0.77;血管壁:κ = 0.57/0.40/0.39)。
FLEXA增强了颈动脉系统的可视化,并改善了颈动脉疾病患者管腔异常和斑块的诊断性能。
1 技术效能阶段:2。