• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

床边临床医生对急性病患者就诊时诊断错误的促成作用的看法:对学术和社区实践的调查。

Bedside Clinicians' Perceptions on the Contributing Role of Diagnostic Errors in Acutely Ill Patient Presentation: A Survey of Academic and Community Practice.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e454-e462. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000840.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000840
PMID:35188935
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions of the occurrence of and factors associated with diagnostic errors in patients evaluated during a rapid response team (RRT) activation or unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A multicenter prospective survey study was conducted among multiprofessional clinicians involved in the care of patients with RRT activations and/or unplanned ICU admissions (UIAs) at 2 academic hospitals and 1 community-based hospital between April 2019 and March 2020. A study investigator screened eligible patients every day. Within 24 hours of the event, a research coordinator administered the survey to clinicians, who were asked the following: whether diagnostic errors contributed to the reason for RRT/UIA, whether any new diagnosis was made after RRT/UIA, if there were any failures to communicate the diagnosis, and if involvement of specialists earlier would have benefited that patient. Patient clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record.

RESULTS

A total of 1815 patients experienced RRT activations, and 1024 patients experienced UIA. Clinicians reported that 18.2% (95/522) of patients experienced diagnostic errors, 8.0% (42/522) experienced a failure of communication, and 16.7% (87/522) may have benefitted from earlier involvement of specialists. Compared with academic settings, clinicians in the community hospital were less likely to report diagnostic errors (7.0% versus 22.8%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians report a high rate of diagnostic errors in patients they evaluate during RRT or UIAs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨临床医生对快速反应团队(RRT)激活或计划外转入重症监护病房(ICU)患者诊断错误的发生和相关因素的看法。

方法

2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月,在 2 所学术医院和 1 所社区医院,对参与 RRT 激活和/或计划外 ICU 入院(UIAs)患者护理的多专业临床医生进行了一项多中心前瞻性调查研究。一名研究调查员每天筛查符合条件的患者。在事件发生后 24 小时内,研究协调员向临床医生发放调查问卷,询问他们以下问题:诊断错误是否导致了 RRT/UIA 的原因,RRT/UIA 后是否做出了新的诊断,是否存在诊断沟通失败的情况,以及更早地让专家参与是否会使该患者受益。患者的临床数据从电子健康记录中提取。

结果

共有 1815 名患者经历了 RRT 激活,1024 名患者经历了 UIA。临床医生报告称,18.2%(95/522)的患者发生了诊断错误,8.0%(42/522)发生了诊断沟通失败,16.7%(87/522)可能受益于更早地让专家参与。与学术环境相比,社区医院的临床医生报告诊断错误的可能性较小(7.0%比 22.8%,P=0.002)。

结论

临床医生报告称,在他们评估 RRT 或 UIAs 期间的患者中,诊断错误的发生率很高。

相似文献

1
Bedside Clinicians' Perceptions on the Contributing Role of Diagnostic Errors in Acutely Ill Patient Presentation: A Survey of Academic and Community Practice.床边临床医生对急性病患者就诊时诊断错误的促成作用的看法:对学术和社区实践的调查。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e454-e462. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000840.
2
Perceptions of interactions between staff members calling, and those responding to, rapid response team activations for patient deterioration.对呼叫快速反应团队以应对患者病情恶化的工作人员与做出回应的人员之间互动的看法。
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Sep;40(4):364-370. doi: 10.1071/AH15138.
3
Vital Signs Predict Rapid-Response Team Activation Within Twelve Hours of Emergency Department Admission.生命体征可预测急诊科入院后12小时内快速反应小组的启动。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 May;17(3):324-30. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.2.28501. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Consequences of Recurrent Activation of a Rapid Response Team: A Multicenter Observational Study.快速反应团队再次激活的患病率、风险因素和临床后果:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):782-789. doi: 10.1177/0885066618773735. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Rapid response team activations within 24 hours of admission from the emergency department: an innovative approach for performance improvement.急诊科入院后24小时内启动快速反应小组:一种改进绩效的创新方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(6):667-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.12394.
6
Frequency, Risk Factors, Causes, and Consequences of Diagnostic Errors in Critically Ill Medical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.危重症医学患者诊断错误的频率、风险因素、原因和后果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):e902-e910. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003976.
7
Differences in the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patient groups reviewed by intensive care liaison nurses in Australia: A multicentre prospective study.澳大利亚重症监护联络护士审查的患者群体的特征、治疗和结局的差异:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2019 Sep;32(5):403-409. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Rapid response team and hospital mortality in hospitalized patients.住院患者的快速反应团队和医院死亡率。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Apr;42(4):494-504. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4254-2. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
9
Rapid response team implementation on a burn surgery/acute care ward.在烧伤外科/急症护理病房实施快速反应小组。
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a2acae.
10
Patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes of 1151 rapid response team activations in a tertiary hospital: a prospective study.一家三级医院1151次快速反应团队启动的患者特征、干预措施及结果:一项前瞻性研究
Intern Med J. 2016 Dec;46(12):1398-1406. doi: 10.1111/imj.13248.

引用本文的文献

1
The combined application of Mini-CEX and Check-list Scales in enhancing clinical competence among emergency and critical care residents: a comparative study.迷你临床演练评估(Mini-CEX)与检查表量表联合应用对提高急诊与重症监护住院医师临床能力的效果:一项对比研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 11;12:1492206. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1492206. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring Stakeholder Perceptions about Using Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Rare and Atypical Infections.探索利益相关者对使用人工智能诊断罕见和非典型感染的看法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):223-233. doi: 10.1055/a-2451-9046. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Evaluation of Digital Health Strategy to Support Clinician-Led Critically Ill Patient Population Management: A Randomized Crossover Study.
支持临床医生主导的重症患者群体管理的数字健康策略评估:一项随机交叉研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 May 3;5(5):e0909. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000909. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Contributors to Diagnostic Error or Delay in the Acute Care Setting: A Survey of Clinical Stakeholders.急性护理环境中诊断错误或延误的影响因素:临床利益相关者调查
Health Serv Insights. 2022 Sep 13;15:11786329221123540. doi: 10.1177/11786329221123540. eCollection 2022.