• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划进行的无菌性膝关节或髋关节翻修术中意外的阳性培养结果——风险因素及其对假体生存率的影响

Unsuspected Positive Cultures in Planned Aseptic Revision Knee or Hip Arthroplasty-Risk Factors and Impact on Survivorship.

作者信息

Schwarze Jan, Dieckmann Ralf, Gosheger Georg, Bensmann Matthias, Moellenbeck Burkhard, Theil Christoph

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brueder Trier, Trier, Germany.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.054. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.054
PMID:35189293
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) may be found at the time of planned aseptic revision surgery and have previously been associated with decreased implant survival. However, reported rates vary greatly, and potential risk factors are widely unknown. This study investigates the rate of UPCs, implant survival, as well as potential risk factors for UPCs and revision.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study on 434 cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA 277) and knee revision arthroplasty (TKA 157) performed between 2010 and 2017. Microbiology culture results, revision-free survival (RFS) and infection-free (IFS) survival, and the potential impact of UPCs as well as patient- or procedure-related risk factors were investigated at a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 41 months).

RESULTS

A total of 37% of patients had a positive culture (160/434). 27% (119/434) had a solitary positive culture, and 9% (41/434) had ≥2 positive cultures of the same species. Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured. Overall, 32% (13/41) of patients with ≥2 positive cultures underwent revision for infection compared with 6% (17/274) of patients with negative cultures. RFS and IFS were reduced if ≥2 cultures were positive. Single positive cultures had no impact on RFS or IFS. Male sex, elevated serum C-reactive protein, and obesity were independently associated with finding ≥2 UPCs in revision THA.

CONCLUSION

Appearance of ≥2 UPCs in aseptic revision leads to reduced RFS and IFS. Males, obese patients, and patients with elevated serum C-reactive protein planned for THA revision should be considered for extended diagnostics to rule out periprosthetic joint infection.

摘要

背景

在计划进行的无菌翻修手术时可能会发现意外的阳性培养结果(UPCs),且此前已发现其与植入物存活率降低有关。然而,报道的发生率差异很大,潜在危险因素也广为人知。本研究调查了UPCs的发生率、植入物存活率以及UPCs和翻修的潜在危险因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入了2010年至2017年间进行的434例全髋关节置换术(THA 277例)和膝关节翻修置换术(TKA 157例)。在至少24个月(中位41个月)的随访中,研究了微生物培养结果、无翻修存活(RFS)和无感染存活(IFS),以及UPCs的潜在影响以及患者或手术相关的危险因素。

结果

共有37%的患者培养结果为阳性(160/434)。27%(119/434)为单一阳性培养结果,9%(41/434)有≥2个相同菌种的阳性培养结果。最常培养出凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。总体而言,≥2个阳性培养结果的患者中有32%(13/41)因感染进行了翻修,而培养结果为阴性的患者中这一比例为6%(17/274)。如果≥2个培养结果为阳性,则RFS和IFS降低。单一阳性培养结果对RFS或IFS无影响。男性、血清C反应蛋白升高和肥胖与翻修THA中发现≥2个UPCs独立相关。

结论

无菌翻修中出现≥2个UPCs会导致RFS和IFS降低。对于计划进行THA翻修的男性、肥胖患者和血清C反应蛋白升高的患者,应考虑进行进一步诊断以排除假体周围关节感染。

相似文献

1
Unsuspected Positive Cultures in Planned Aseptic Revision Knee or Hip Arthroplasty-Risk Factors and Impact on Survivorship.计划进行的无菌性膝关节或髋关节翻修术中意外的阳性培养结果——风险因素及其对假体生存率的影响
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.054. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
2
Unsuspected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Management, and Infection-Free Survivorship.无菌性翻修膝关节置换术中意外的阳性术中培养:患病率、处理方法和无感染生存率。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Oct;39(10):2581-2590. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.007. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
3
The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection : incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions.隐匿性人工关节感染:在假定无菌的膝关节和髋关节翻修术中术中培养阳性的发生率及后果
Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1482-1489. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2016-0655.R2.
4
The Role of Single Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Total Hip and Knee Revision Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature.单一阳性培养物在疑似无菌性全髋关节和膝关节翻修手术中的作用——文献系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 8;13(9):1655. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091655.
5
Survivorship and Etiologies of Failure in Single-stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis.一期翻修治疗人工关节置换术后感染的生存状况和失败病因:一项荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 May 11;7(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00218. eCollection 2023 May 1.
6
Outcomes of patients with unexpected diagnosis of infection at total hip or total knee arthroplasty revisions.髋关节或膝关节翻修术时意外诊断为感染的患者的结局。
Int Orthop. 2021 Nov;45(11):2791-2796. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05137-8. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后早期无菌翻修手术会增加人工关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3661-3667. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.089. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
8
Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty.无菌性髋关节和膝关节翻修术中意外的阳性培养结果。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Oct 4;5(10):832-836. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0032.R1.
9
Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties After Solid Organ Transplant.实体器官移植后的髋关节和膝关节翻修置换术
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1560-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.047. Epub 2016 Dec 11.
10
Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty.疑似无菌性翻修髋关节置换术中意外阳性术中培养的流行率和结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Aug 4;103(15):1392-1401. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01559.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative antibiotic treatment does not lower re-revision rate in presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures - a matched cohort study.术后抗生素治疗并不能降低术中培养意外呈阳性的假定无菌性髋关节和膝关节翻修置换术的再次翻修率——一项配对队列研究。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Mar 7;10(2):51-59. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-51-2025. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the Clinical Relevance of Routine Sonication for Periprosthetic Hip or Knee Joint Infection Diagnosis.评估常规超声检查对人工髋关节或膝关节周围感染诊断的临床相关性。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;13(4):366. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040366.
3
Antibiotic prophylaxis before tissue biopsy has no effect on culture results in presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.
在假定为无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中,组织活检前使用抗生素预防对培养结果无影响。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2024 Feb 15;9(1):67-74. doi: 10.5194/jbji-9-67-2024. eCollection 2024.
4
The Role of Single Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Total Hip and Knee Revision Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature.单一阳性培养物在疑似无菌性全髋关节和膝关节翻修手术中的作用——文献系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 8;13(9):1655. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091655.
5
A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节翻修术术前预后因素及结局指标的映射综述
Bone Jt Open. 2023 May 10;4(5):338-356. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2022-0157.R1.