• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺氟沙星与吡哌酸治疗由敏感病原体引起的复杂性尿路感染的比较临床试验。

Norfloxacin versus pipemidic acid in complicated urinary tract infections due to susceptible pathogens: a comparative clinical trial.

作者信息

Del Favero A, Frongillo R F, Menichetti F, Boldrini F, Guerciolini R, Pauluzzi S

出版信息

Chemioterapia. 1986 Apr;5(2):88-91.

PMID:3518966
Abstract

Norfloxacin (NOR) was compared to pipemidic acid (PA) in complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by pathogens susceptible to both agents to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the new 4-quinolone derivative. Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to receive NOR or PA, 400 mg bid for 7 days, and the results evaluated for treatment efficacy at 5 weeks after completion of therapy. Overall microbiological cure was significantly greater in NOR-treated patients, as 19 of 26 were cured (73%), compared to only 16 of 39 (41%) in the PA group (p less than 0.05). Failures and relapses, considered together, were significantly (p less than 0.05) less frequent in patients treated with NOR (4/26) than in those receiving PA (18/39). Clinical response was strictly related to microbiological outcome: NOR had a broader antibacterial spectrum than PA and in this study seemed to be more efficacious in the treatment of complicated UTIs caused only by bacteria susceptible to both agents. This may be related to greater antibacterial activity and/or tissue penetration by NOR, which is thus to be preferred, according to the results of our study, in the treatment of complicated UTIs.

摘要

在由对诺氟沙星(NOR)和吡哌酸(PA)均敏感的病原体引起的复杂性尿路感染(UTIs)中,对诺氟沙星与吡哌酸进行了比较,以评估这种新型4-喹诺酮衍生物的抗菌活性。65例患者被随机分配接受诺氟沙星或吡哌酸治疗,400mg,每日两次,共7天,并在治疗结束后5周评估治疗效果。接受诺氟沙星治疗的患者总体微生物学治愈率显著更高,26例中有19例治愈(73%),而吡哌酸组39例中仅16例治愈(41%)(p<0.05)。综合考虑,接受诺氟沙星治疗的患者失败和复发的频率显著低于接受吡哌酸治疗的患者(p<0.05)(分别为4/26和18/39)。临床反应与微生物学结果密切相关:诺氟沙星的抗菌谱比吡哌酸更广,在本研究中,对于仅由对两种药物均敏感的细菌引起的复杂性尿路感染,诺氟沙星似乎更有效。这可能与诺氟沙星更强的抗菌活性和/或组织穿透力有关,因此根据我们的研究结果,在治疗复杂性尿路感染时,诺氟沙星更值得首选。

相似文献

1
Norfloxacin versus pipemidic acid in complicated urinary tract infections due to susceptible pathogens: a comparative clinical trial.诺氟沙星与吡哌酸治疗由敏感病原体引起的复杂性尿路感染的比较临床试验。
Chemioterapia. 1986 Apr;5(2):88-91.
2
[Comparative studies of DL-8280 and pipemidic acid in complicated urinary tract infections by double-blind method].[采用双盲法对DL - 8280与吡哌酸治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较研究]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1984 Sep;30(9):1307-55.
3
[Quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the health area of a 650-bed hospital].
Actas Urol Esp. 1994 Jun;18(6):634-8.
4
Antibacterial activity after a single-dose of norfloxacin, ofloxacin and pipemidic acid detected in urine of volunteers.在志愿者尿液中检测到单剂量诺氟沙星、氧氟沙星和吡哌酸后的抗菌活性。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1988;14(8):533-7.
5
Treatment of urinary infections: clinical perspectives.泌尿系统感染的治疗:临床观点。
Chemioterapia. 1987 Feb;6(1):45-9.
6
In vitro activity of pefloxacin compared with five other quinolones on nalidixic acid-resistant proteae species.培氟沙星与其他五种喹诺酮类药物对耐萘啶酸变形杆菌属细菌的体外活性比较。
Chemioterapia. 1988 Oct;7(5):287-91.
7
[Pipemidinic acid as a urinary antiseptic--microbiological and clinical study].[吡哌酸作为尿路防腐剂的微生物学及临床研究]
Vutr Boles. 1985;24(5):46-53.
8
In vivo activity of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin and pipemidic acid against Escherichia coli infections in mice.环丙沙星、氧氟沙星、诺氟沙星和吡哌酸对小鼠大肠杆菌感染的体内活性。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1989;15(2):53-8.
9
[Clinical trial of drugs for treating urological infections--pipemidic acid].[治疗泌尿系统感染药物的临床试验——吡哌酸]
Vutr Boles. 1985;24(2):61-5.
10
[Pipemidic acid: a new antibiotic for the urinary tract. A comparative, double-blind study of pipemidic acid and amoxidillin].吡哌酸:一种新型尿路抗生素。吡哌酸与阿莫西林的比较性双盲研究
Acta Urol Belg. 1980 Oct;48(4):471-7.