Fleischer D
Endoscopy. 1986 May;18 Suppl 2:52-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018428.
Laser use in the United States for the treatment of gastrointestinal disease in general, and for upper GI bleeding in particular has grown exponentially. In 1979, only 3 American medical centers were using lasers for the therapy of UGI bleeding. Today, lasers are employed in more than 200 centers. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates its use, has ruled that it is safe and effective, and therefore is no longer considered to be an investigational device. Most commonly it is used to treat discrete lesions such as ulcers, but it has been employed for other lesions, including varices. A recent American randomized controlled trial assessing its efficacy in acute esophageal variceal bleeding, found it to be effective for initial hemostasis; however, rebleeding was common. A key question is whether or not the laser is superior to other less costly and more portable modalities for treating acute UGI bleeding. One U.S. investigator recently presented data which suggested to him that the heater probe was better than the laser. There is insufficient comparative data available to answer the critical question about the relative superiority of one endoscopic treatment modality as compared to another. Foreseeable technologic advances may make laser therapy easier and more effective.
在美国,激光用于治疗一般胃肠道疾病,尤其是上消化道出血的情况呈指数级增长。1979年,仅有3家美国医疗中心使用激光治疗上消化道出血。如今,超过200家中心都在使用激光。最近,负责监管激光使用的美国食品药品监督管理局裁定其安全有效,因此不再被视为试验性设备。最常见的是用于治疗离散性病变,如溃疡,但也用于其他病变,包括静脉曲张。最近一项评估激光在急性食管静脉曲张出血中疗效的美国随机对照试验发现,它对初始止血有效;然而,再出血很常见。一个关键问题是,在治疗急性上消化道出血方面,激光是否优于其他成本更低、更便于携带的治疗方式。一位美国研究人员最近展示的数据表明,热探头比激光更好。目前尚无足够的比较数据来回答关于一种内镜治疗方式相对于另一种方式的相对优越性这一关键问题。可预见的技术进步可能会使激光治疗更简便、更有效。