• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿色金融与企业环境违规:来自违法排污行为的检验

Green finance and corporate environmental violations: a test from the perspective of illegal pollution discharge behaviors.

机构信息

School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(32):48477-48490. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19228-5. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-19228-5
PMID:35192164
Abstract

Green finance aims to intervene in investment and financing behaviors through financial means, so as to promote upgrading of heavily polluting industries. Whether it can reduce illegal pollution discharge behaviors is the focus of this paper. This paper is to explore the impact of green finance on illegal emissions of heavy polluting firms. Taking green finance pilot zones (GFPZ) in 2017 as a quasi-natural experiment, the paper measures illegal emission behaviors based on day-night difference of PM at the nearest atmospheric monitoring points and tests the impact of GFPZ on illegal emissions based on triple difference model (DDD). The results show that GFPZ inhibits illegal emissions. Influence path result shows that GFPZ reduces illegal emissions by increasing financing constraint, green innovation, and fulfilling social responsibility. At the same time, this paper also notes that regulatory distance has an interference effect on GFPZ. GFPZ aggravates illegal emission as heavy polluting firms - financial institution's distance is more than 40 km. GFPZ curbs illegal pollution more significantly as heavy polluting firms - environmental protection bureau distance is within 30 km. This paper aims to reveal the guiding effect of green finance on emission behavior of polluting firms and provide policy references for reducing emission and promoting green finance.

摘要

绿色金融旨在通过金融手段干预投资和融资行为,从而促进重污染产业的升级。其能否减少重污染企业的非法污染排放行为是本文关注的焦点。本文旨在探讨绿色金融对重污染企业非法排放的影响。以 2017 年绿色金融试验区(GFPZ)为准自然实验,基于最近大气监测点的昼夜 PM 差异衡量非法排放行为,并基于三重差分模型(DDD)检验 GFPZ 对非法排放的影响。结果表明,GFPZ 抑制了非法排放。影响路径结果表明,GFPZ 通过增加融资约束、绿色创新和履行社会责任来减少非法排放。同时,本文还指出,监管距离对 GFPZ 有干扰作用。当重污染企业与金融机构的距离超过 40 公里时,GFPZ 会加剧非法排放。当重污染企业与环境保护局的距离在 30 公里以内时,GFPZ 对非法污染的抑制作用更为显著。本文旨在揭示绿色金融对污染企业排放行为的引导作用,为减排和促进绿色金融提供政策参考。

相似文献

1
Green finance and corporate environmental violations: a test from the perspective of illegal pollution discharge behaviors.绿色金融与企业环境违规:来自违法排污行为的检验
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(32):48477-48490. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19228-5. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Can environmental protection tax aggravate illegal pollution discharge of heavy polluting enterprises?环境保护税会加重重污染企业的违法排污吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33796-33808. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18002-3. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
3
The impact of green mergers and acquisitions on illegal pollution discharge of heavy polluting firms: Mechanism, heterogeneity and spillover effects.绿色并购对重污染企业违法排污的影响:作用机制、异质性与溢出效应。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 15;340:117973. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117973. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China.绿色金融与企业环境责任:来自中国重污染上市企业的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(49):74081-74096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21065-5. Epub 2022 May 28.
5
Green Financial Reform and Corporate ESG Performance in China: Empirical Evidence from the Green Financial Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone.中国绿色金融改革与企业 ESG 绩效:来自绿色金融改革创新试验区的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;19(22):14981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214981.
6
Does digital finance improve the green investment of Chinese listed heavily polluting companies? The perspective of corporate financialization.数字金融是否会提高中国重污染上市公司的绿色投资?基于企业金融化视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71047-71063. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20803-z. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
Whether Green Finance Improves Green Innovation of Listed Companies-Evidence from China.论绿色金融是否能提升上市公司的绿色创新——来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;19(17):10882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710882.
8
Green finance improves enterprises' environmental, social and governance performance: A two-dimensional perspective based on external financing capability and internal technological innovation.绿色金融提升企业环境、社会和治理绩效:基于外部融资能力和内部技术创新的二维视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0302198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302198. eCollection 2024.
9
Distance matters: Investigating how geographic proximity to ENGOs triggers green innovation of heavy-polluting firms in China.距离很重要:研究地理接近环保组织如何引发中国重污染企业的绿色创新。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 1;279:111542. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111542. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
10
How High-Polluting Firms Suffer from Being Distracted form Intended Purpose: A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective.高污染企业因分心而遭受损失:企业社会责任视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;17(24):9197. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249197.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Evolutionary Game of Water Environment Governance Behavior from the Perspective of Public Participation.公众参与视角下的水环境治理行为演化博弈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14732. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214732.