CeRiSM Research Centre for Sport, Mountain, and Health, University of Verona, Rovereto, Trento, Italy; Exercise Research Laboratory, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
NeuroMuscularFunction Research Group, Department of Medical Sciences, School of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
J Biomech. 2022 Mar;134:111001. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111001. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
Although it has already been demonstrated that Nordic walking has some peculiar biomechanical features with respect to walking, the effects on balance and trunk coordination are still unknown. Our aim here was to compare margins of stability, hip stabilizer muscle activation and scapular-pelvis coordination (mean and variability of continuous relative phase) between walking and two different pole walking techniques (observational design). Eleven Nordic walking instructors were asked to walk at 5.5 km·h on a flat treadmill while 1) walking, 2) Nordic walking and 3) pole walking with just elbow flexion-extension motion allowed and constrained shoulder motion (elbow technique). The 3D movements of limbs and poles were measured by an optoelectronic motion capture system, and gluteus medius activation was measured through surface electromyography. Both techniques using poles show larger mediolateral margins of stability and similar anterior-posterior margins of stability in comparison with walking (p < 0.001). The larger mediolateral margin of stability using poles (conditions 2 and 3) is accompanied by greater trunk coordination stability (greater continuous relative phase variability) than walking. Although the Nordic walking (condition 2) technique results in a similar range of scapular and pelvis transverse rotation, the general pattern of scapular-pelvis coordination was temporally delayed by approximately 20% of the gait cycle in relation to other conditions (1 and 3). In conclusion, Nordic walking provides enhanced mediolateral support and coordination stability of trunk compared with walking, suggesting that it could be proposed as a safer exercise modality than walking.
尽管已经证明,与步行相比,北欧式健走有一些特殊的生物力学特征,但平衡和躯干协调的影响仍不清楚。我们的目的是比较稳定性、髋关节稳定肌激活和肩胛骨-骨盆协调(连续相对相位的均值和变异性)在步行和两种不同的持杖行走技术(观察性设计)之间的差异。要求 11 名北欧式健走指导员在平地上的跑步机上以 5.5km·h 的速度行走,同时进行 1)步行,2)北欧式健走,3)只允许肘部屈伸运动而限制肩部运动的持杖行走(肘部技术)。肢体和手杖的 3D 运动通过光电运动捕捉系统测量,臀中肌的激活通过表面肌电图测量。与步行相比,使用手杖的两种技术均显示出更大的横向稳定性和相似的前后稳定性(p<0.001)。使用手杖的较大横向稳定性(条件 2 和 3)伴随着更大的躯干协调稳定性(更大的连续相对相位变异性)。尽管北欧式健走(条件 2)技术导致肩胛骨和骨盆横向旋转的范围相似,但与其他条件(1 和 3)相比,肩胛骨-骨盆协调的一般模式在时间上延迟了大约 20%的步态周期。总之,与步行相比,北欧式健走提供了更好的横向支撑和躯干协调稳定性,表明它可能是一种比步行更安全的运动方式。