Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Mazovia Regional Hospital in Siedlce, Poland.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(1):1-2. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.113490.
I have attentively read the article "Minute Zero: an essential assessment in peri-operative ultrasound for anaesthesia" by Elena Segura-Grau et al. [1]. The authors have suggested using point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) as part of a comprehensive anaesthetic assessment in the perioperative period. Such an extension of the standard perioperative examination aimed at searching for pathologies that may affect the intra- and postoperative course performed by an anaes-thesiologist seems fully justified and may have a significant impact on treatment outcomes [2]. In the "Minute Zero" model, the authors have suggested that POCUS assessment of anaesthetised patients should be carried out twice - on admission to the operating theatre and before transfer to the postoperative ward. The described scheme is based on the well-known eFAST, FATE and BLUE protocols (assessment to determine the presence of free fluid in the body cavities, basic cardiac assessment, including IVC, and lung ultrasound assessment). The examination conducted in the manner specified by the authors provides a general but holistic picture of the patient, focused at detecting life-threatening pathologies. It is right to include a preoperative assessment of the filling of the stomach in the protocol, as the surface area of the pylorus found on ultrasound scans indicates the risk of aspiration during the induction of general anaesthesia [3, 4]. This may be of particular importance in patients undergoing emergency procedures, with gastrointestinal obstruction or in those with difficult contact (mainly children and the elderly). In the algorithm described, the assessment of bladder filling in the postoperative period has been emphasised. This is a huge asset, which is often overlooked and, as the authors rightly point out, can cause postoperative delirium, especially in the elderly. The authors have developed an examination card that enables to document the examination in a simple and transparent manner based on markings of the appropriate blanks, which makes the protocol very friendly. The additional pros of the publication are the attached sample ultrasound images, which perfectly illustrate the ease of diagnosis of basic pathologies.
我认真阅读了 ElenaSegura-Grau 等人撰写的文章《围术期超声麻醉中的“零分钟”:基本评估》[1]。作者建议将即时床旁超声(POCUS)作为围术期综合麻醉评估的一部分。这种扩展标准围术期检查的方法旨在寻找可能影响麻醉医师进行的围术期和术后过程的病理改变,似乎是完全合理的,并且可能对治疗结果产生重大影响[2]。在“零分钟”模型中,作者建议对麻醉患者的 POCUS 评估应在两次进行——进入手术室时和转移到术后病房前。所描述的方案基于众所周知的 eFAST、FATE 和 BLUE 方案(评估确定体腔中是否存在游离液体、基本心脏评估,包括 IVC 和肺部超声评估)。作者指定的方式进行的检查提供了患者的总体但整体的情况,重点是发现危及生命的病理改变。在方案中包括术前评估胃的充盈度是正确的,因为超声扫描上发现的幽门表面积表明全身麻醉诱导期间发生误吸的风险[3,4]。这在接受紧急手术、胃肠道梗阻或接触困难的患者(主要是儿童和老年人)中可能尤为重要。在描述的算法中,强调了术后膀胱充盈的评估。这是一个巨大的优势,通常会被忽视,正如作者正确指出的那样,它会导致术后谵妄,尤其是在老年人中。作者开发了一种检查卡,可通过标记适当的空白来简单透明地记录检查结果,从而使方案非常友好。该出版物的其他优点是附加的示例超声图像,它们完美地说明了基本病理改变的易于诊断。