• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线教学讨论参与风格量表的开发。

Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions.

作者信息

Pala Ferhat Kadir, Erdem Mukaddes

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department, Aksaray University, B Blok, Room B113, 68100 Aksaray, Turkey.

Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Educ Technol Res Dev. 2020;68(6):3213-3233. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x
PMID:35194355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8852623/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a standardized measurement tool that can be used to determine the participation styles of individuals participating in online instructional discussions. The scale consists of two dimensions called 'Why' and 'How.' The Why dimension comprises the main motivators of the participants' participation in online instructional environments, whereas the How dimension comprises items expressing participation behaviors or forms. Two separate datasets were used for exploratory factor analysis (450 participants) and confirmatory factor analysis (693 participants), and the scale was applied to both undergraduate and graduate students. The scale consisted of eight factors, with four in the Why dimension and four in the How dimension. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale was able to identify four different patterns of participation. Expressed as participation styles, these patterns are To Socialize/Connective, To Get Information/Analytical, To Discuss/Innovative, and To Fulfill Requirements/Practical. According to these results, the Participation Style Scale for Online Instructional Discussions was assumed to be a valid and a reliable measurement tool for determining the participation styles of participants of online instructional discussions. These four styles are thought to contribute to the instructors, the researchers, and the learners who want to benefit from effective learning in online environments. Instructors and researchers can determine learners' participation styles before organizing discussion environments, and learners who think and gain awareness about their own participation styles can manage their discussion and learning processes more effectively.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发一种标准化的测量工具,用于确定参与在线教学讨论的个体的参与方式。该量表由两个维度组成,分别称为“为什么”和“如何”。“为什么”维度包括参与者参与在线教学环境的主要动机,而“如何”维度包括表达参与行为或形式的项目。两个独立的数据集分别用于探索性因素分析(450名参与者)和验证性因素分析(693名参与者),该量表应用于本科生和研究生。该量表由八个因素组成,“为什么”维度有四个,“如何”维度有四个。验证性因素分析的结果表明,该量表能够识别出四种不同的参与模式。以参与方式表示,这些模式分别是社交/连接型、获取信息/分析型、讨论/创新型和满足要求/实用型。根据这些结果,在线教学讨论参与方式量表被认为是一种有效且可靠的测量工具,用于确定在线教学讨论参与者的参与方式。这四种方式被认为对希望从在线环境中的有效学习中受益的教师、研究人员和学习者有帮助。教师和研究人员可以在组织讨论环境之前确定学习者的参与方式,而那些思考并了解自己参与方式的学习者可以更有效地管理他们的讨论和学习过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5beb/8852623/55cd08839374/11423_2020_9817_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5beb/8852623/806e77a6b510/11423_2020_9817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5beb/8852623/55cd08839374/11423_2020_9817_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5beb/8852623/806e77a6b510/11423_2020_9817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5beb/8852623/55cd08839374/11423_2020_9817_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions.在线教学讨论参与风格量表的开发。
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2020;68(6):3213-3233. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
2
Influence of learning style on instructional multimedia effects on graduate student cognitive and psychomotor performance.学习风格对教学多媒体在研究生认知和心理运动表现方面效果的影响。
J Allied Health. 2006 Fall;35(3):e182-203.
3
Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.学习风格:概念与证据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Dec;9(3):105-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
4
Participation style and social anxiety as predictors of active participation in asynchronous discussion forums and academic achievement.参与方式和社交焦虑作为异步讨论论坛中积极参与和学业成绩的预测因素。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Feb 16:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11517-3.
5
Comparing learners' knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes between two instructional modes of computer programming in secondary education.比较中等教育中计算机编程两种教学模式下学习者的知识、行为和态度。
Int J STEM Educ. 2021;8(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00311-1. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
Predominant learning styles among pharmacy students at the Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.巴西巴拉那联邦大学药学生的主要学习风格。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Jan-Mar;14(1):650. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.650. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Enhancing Learner Participation in Online Discussion Forums in Massive Open Online Courses: The Role of Mandatory Participation.提高大规模在线开放课程中学习者在在线讨论论坛中的参与度:强制参与的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 15;13:819640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819640. eCollection 2022.
8
The relation of dental students' learning styles to their satisfaction with traditional and inverted classroom models.牙科学员的学习风格与他们对传统课堂和翻转课堂模式满意度的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1749-x.
9
First year medical students' learning style preferences and their correlation with performance in different subjects within the medical course.医学专业一年级学生的学习风格偏好及其与医学课程不同科目成绩的相关性。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 8;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0965-5.
10
Engaging learners in synchronous online learning.让学习者参与同步在线学习。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(4):4429-4452. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11393-x. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the application effect of inter-professional training program for newly enrolled medical staff in operating room based on digital information technology.基于数字信息技术的新入职手术室医务人员跨专业培训方案应用效果研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06256-7.
2
Participation style and social anxiety as predictors of active participation in asynchronous discussion forums and academic achievement.参与方式和社交焦虑作为异步讨论论坛中积极参与和学业成绩的预测因素。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Feb 16:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11517-3.
3
The webcam and student engagement in synchronous online learning: visually or verbally?

本文引用的文献

1
Education and the COVID-19 pandemic.教育与新冠疫情
Prospects (Paris). 2020;49(1-2):91-96. doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
2
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.验证性因素分析中的报告规范:概述与若干建议
Psychol Methods. 2009 Mar;14(1):6-23. doi: 10.1037/a0014694.
网络摄像头与学生在同步在线学习中的参与度:视觉还是语言方面?
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):10405-10428. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11050-3. Epub 2022 Apr 18.