• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员与参与“理解痴呆症大规模开放在线课程”的讨论板的互动。

Family carers of people living with dementia and discussion board engagement in the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course.

机构信息

Wicking Dementia Research & Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2023 May;27(5):887-895. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2042188. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2022.2042188
PMID:35195059
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compared discussion board involvement between family carers and non-carers in the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course (UD-MOOC).

METHODS

A mixed methods observational cohort study of family carers and non-carers was undertaken over the February-April 2020 UD-MOOC. Discussion board engagement was measured as number of posts and replies and examined longitudinally using mixed models. Discussion topics were explored through structural topic models (STM). Subsequently, thematic analysis of STM derived-topic exemplars was conducted to contextualise these discussions.

RESULTS

Family carers were ( = 2320) found to post ( < 0.001) and reply ( = 0.029) significantly more often than non-carers ( = 2392). Of the 32-STM derived-topics, meaningful activities (mean Δ = 0.007, 95% CrI [0.005-0.100]), personal stories of diagnosis (mean Δ = 0.007, 95% CrI [0.005-0.009]), and family history of dementia (mean Δ = 0.006, 95% CrI [0.004-0.008]) were discussed significantly more frequently by family carers compared to non-carers.

CONCLUSION

These results may reflect underlying motivational differences and circumstantial relevance. Perhaps the greater engagement by family carers is related to a sense of having inadequate relevant offline social resources, where engagement in the UD-MOOC discussion boards may serve as means to share experiences with others.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了参与和不参与“理解痴呆症大规模开放在线课程(UD-MOOC)”的家庭照顾者在讨论板上的参与度。

方法

这是一项关于家庭照顾者和非照顾者的混合方法观察队列研究,在 2020 年 2 月至 4 月的 UD-MOOC 期间进行。使用混合模型纵向测量讨论板参与度,作为帖子和回复的数量进行测量。通过结构主题模型(STM)探讨讨论主题。随后,对 STM 衍生主题范例进行主题分析,以对这些讨论进行背景化。

结果

发现家庭照顾者( = 2320)的帖子( < 0.001)和回复( = 0.029)频率明显高于非照顾者( = 2392)。在 32 个 STM 衍生主题中,家庭照顾者讨论的有意义活动(平均 Δ = 0.007,95% CrI [0.005-0.100])、个人诊断故事(平均 Δ = 0.007,95% CrI [0.005-0.009])和家族痴呆史(平均 Δ = 0.006,95% CrI [0.004-0.008])的频率明显高于非照顾者。

结论

这些结果可能反映了潜在的动机差异和环境相关性。也许家庭照顾者的更高参与度与他们感到缺乏相关的线下社交资源有关,而参与 UD-MOOC 讨论板可能成为与他人分享经验的一种方式。

相似文献

1
Family carers of people living with dementia and discussion board engagement in the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course.痴呆症患者的家庭护理人员与参与“理解痴呆症大规模开放在线课程”的讨论板的互动。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 May;27(5):887-895. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2042188. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Relationship between participants' level of education and engagement in their completion of the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course.参与者的教育水平与其完成“了解痴呆症”大规模开放在线课程的参与度之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 26;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0344-z.
3
Experiences of Integrated Care for Dementia from Family and Carer Perspectives: A Framework Analysis of Massive Open Online Course Discussion Board Posts.从家庭和照顾者的角度看痴呆症的综合护理体验:大规模开放在线课程讨论板帖子的框架分析。
Dementia (London). 2019 May;18(4):1492-1506. doi: 10.1177/1471301217719991. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
4
Massive Open Online Courses: enhancing caregiver education and support about dementia care towards and at end of life.大规模开放在线课程:提高照护者关于痴呆症照护的教育和支持,以实现和在生命末期提供照护。
Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):171-174. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz150.
5
Community Occupational Therapy for people with dementia and family carers (COTiD-UK) versus treatment as usual (Valuing Active Life in Dementia [VALID]) study: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial.社区职业疗法对痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者的影响(COTiD-UK)与常规治疗(痴呆症中的积极生活价值[VALID])研究:一项单盲、随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jan 4;18(1):e1003433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003433. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Creating 'Partnership in iSupport program' to optimise family carers' impact on dementia care: a randomised controlled trial protocol.创建“iSupport 计划中的合作伙伴关系”以优化家庭护理员对痴呆症护理的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 10;22(1):762. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08148-2.
7
Life under lockdown and social restrictions - the experiences of people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.封控和社交限制下的生活——英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间痴呆症患者及其照护者的经历。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 10;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02257-z.
8
An analysis of carer burden among family carers of people with and without dementia in Ireland.爱尔兰痴呆症患者和非痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的照顾者负担分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Apr;33(4):347-358. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000769. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
Health Inequities in the Care Pathways for People Living with Young- and Late-Onset Dementia: From Pre-COVID-19 to Early Pandemic.《COVID-19 大流行前至早期阶段:中青年及晚发型痴呆患者的照护路径中的健康不公平现象》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020686.
10
Emotional Word Use in Informal Carers of People Living With Dementia: Linguistic Analysis of Online Discussion Forums.痴呆症患者非正式照料者使用情感词汇的情况:在线讨论论坛的语言分析
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jun 17;5(2):e32603. doi: 10.2196/32603.

引用本文的文献

1
Open Online Courses for Informal Carers: Systematic Integrative Review.面向非正式照料者的开放在线课程:系统综合评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 28;27:e72808. doi: 10.2196/72808.
2
Challenges of conducting of online educational programs for family caregivers of people with dementia living at home: An integrative review.为居家痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者开展在线教育项目的挑战:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Dec 29;10(1):121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.12.017. eCollection 2023 Jan.