• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双吻压握支架技术的挑战和结果:来自 PROGRESS-BIFURCATION 注册研究的见解。

Challenges and outcomes of the double kissing crush stenting technique: Insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.

机构信息

Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Science Centers, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):1038-1044. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30135. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30135
PMID:35195331
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the double kissing (DK) crush stenting technique can provide excellent outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions, it can be challenging to perform.

METHODS

We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics, challenges encountered, and procedural outcomes of bifurcation PCI with DK crush in Prospective Global Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions (PROGRESS-BIFURCATION, NCT05100992).

RESULTS

DK crush was used in 48 of 435 bifurcation lesions (11%). Technical success was 100%, procedural success was 96%, and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events was 4%. Challenges while performing DK crush were encountered in 26 lesions (54%): (1) difficulty in side branch (SB) first rewiring (38%) that was overcome with the use of a new guidewire (30%) or a microcatheter (15%); (2) inability to deliver balloon to an SB for the first kiss (54%) that was overcome with the use of a smaller balloon (86%), rewiring (29%), microcatheter (14%), and increased support 7%; (3) difficulty in SB second rewiring (19%) that was overcome with the use of a new guidewire (80%) and/or microcatheter (60%). DK crush was more often performed in left main and proximal left anterior descending artery lesions (70% vs. 50%, p = 0.014). DK crush cases required more contrast (198 ± 84 ml vs. 163 ± 70 ml, p = 0.003), fluoroscopy time (35 ± 20 min vs. 25 ± 21 min, p = 0.004), and lasted longer (137 ± 69 min vs. 99 ± 66 min, p = 0.001) compared with non-DK crush techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

While challenges are common when performing DK crush bifurcation stenting, success rates are high and complication rates are low.

摘要

背景

尽管双吻(DK)挤压支架技术在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)分叉病变中能提供出色的结果,但操作具有一定挑战性。

方法

我们检查了前瞻性全球经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变注册研究(PROGRESS-BIFURCATION,NCT05100992)中分叉 PCI 采用 DK 挤压技术的临床和血管造影特征、遇到的挑战以及手术结果。

结果

在 435 个分叉病变中,48 个(11%)采用了 DK 挤压技术。技术成功率为 100%,手术成功率为 96%,住院期间主要不良心血管事件发生率为 4%。在 26 个病变(54%)中遇到了 DK 挤压操作的挑战:(1)SB 首次重布线困难(38%),使用新导丝(30%)或微导管(15%)克服;(2)第一次亲吻时无法将球囊输送到 SB(54%),使用较小的球囊(86%)、重布线(29%)、微导管(14%)和增加 7%的支持克服;(3)SB 第二次重布线困难(19%),使用新导丝(80%)和/或微导管(60%)克服。DK 挤压更常用于左主干和近端左前降支病变(70%比 50%,p=0.014)。DK 挤压病例需要更多的造影剂(198±84ml 比 163±70ml,p=0.003)、透视时间(35±20min 比 25±21min,p=0.004)和持续时间更长(137±69min 比 99±66min,p=0.001)。

结论

虽然在进行 DK 挤压分叉支架术时会遇到常见的挑战,但成功率高,并发症发生率低。

相似文献

1
Challenges and outcomes of the double kissing crush stenting technique: Insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.双吻压握支架技术的挑战和结果:来自 PROGRESS-BIFURCATION 注册研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):1038-1044. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30135. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis demonstrates superiority of double-kissing crush in complex lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变的支架置入技术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析显示,在复杂病变中,双对吻挤压术优于其他技术。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):761-775. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01979-9. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
3
Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术的临床结局:包含 5711 例患者的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1432-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.054.
4
Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: Evidence from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.冠状动脉分叉病变的支架置入技术:来自随机临床试验网络荟萃分析的证据。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):E306-E318. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29097. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
DK-Crush or Mini-Crush Stenting for Complex Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: The Multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM Registry.DK挤压式或迷你挤压式支架置入术治疗复杂左主干分叉病变:多中心EVOLUTE-CRUSH LM注册研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):e040166. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040166. Epub 2025 May 21.
6
Impact of Side Branch Predilatation on Provisional Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Insights From PROGRESS-BIFURCATION Registry.边支预扩张对临时分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响:来自PROGRESS-BIFURCATION注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 May;105(6):1349-1355. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31465. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
7
Clinical outcomes following different stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.不同支架置入技术治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的临床结局:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Oct 23;19(8):664-675. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00013.
8
Comparison of Different Stenting Techniques in Left Main Bifurcation Disease: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis.比较左主干分叉病变不同支架置入技术:网状 Meta 分析证据。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Apr;34(4):E334-E342. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00093.
9
Outcomes and challenges of the provisional stenting technique: Insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.临时支架技术的结果和挑战:来自 PROGRESS-BIFURCATION 注册研究的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):749-755. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30401. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
10
Double kissing crush versus culotte for bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.双吻挤压术与裤裙式支架术用于分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自PROGRESS-BIFURCATION注册研究的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2025 Jun;37(6). doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00350.