Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 May 17;107(6):e2381-e2387. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac047.
Insulin pump use in type 1 diabetes management has significantly increased in recent years, but we have few data on its impact on inpatient admissions for acute diabetes complications.
We used the 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2019 Kids' Inpatient Database to identify all-cause type 1 diabetes hospital admissions in those with and without documented insulin pump use and insulin pump failure. We described differences in (1) prevalence of acute diabetes complications, (2) severity of illness during hospitalization and disposition after discharge, and (3) length of stay (LOS) and inpatient costs.
We identified 228 474 all-cause admissions. Insulin pump use was documented in 7% of admissions, of which 20% were due to pump failure. The prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was 47% in pump nonusers, 39% in pump users, and 60% in those with pump failure. Admissions for hyperglycemia without DKA, hypoglycemia, sepsis, and soft tissue infections were rare and similar across all groups. Admissions with pump failure had a higher proportion of admissions classified as major severity of illness (14.7%) but had the lowest LOS (1.60 days, 95% CI 1.55-1.65) and healthcare costs ($13 078, 95% CI $12 549-$13 608).
Despite the increased prevalence of insulin pump in the United States, a minority of pediatric admissions documented insulin pump use, which may represent undercoding. DKA admission rates were lower among insulin pump users compared to pump nonusers. Improved accuracy in coding practices and other approaches to identify insulin pump users in administrative data are needed, as are interventions to mitigate risk for DKA.
近年来,胰岛素泵在 1 型糖尿病管理中的使用显著增加,但我们几乎没有关于其对急性糖尿病并发症住院的影响的数据。
我们使用 2006 年、2009 年、2012 年和 2019 年的儿童住院数据库,确定有和没有记录胰岛素泵使用和胰岛素泵故障的所有原因 1 型糖尿病住院患者。我们描述了以下方面的差异:(1)急性糖尿病并发症的发生率;(2)住院期间疾病严重程度和出院后的处置;(3)住院时间(LOS)和住院费用。
我们确定了 228474 例所有原因的入院。7%的入院记录了胰岛素泵的使用,其中 20%是由于泵故障。非胰岛素泵使用者中糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的发生率为 47%,胰岛素泵使用者为 39%,胰岛素泵故障者为 60%。高血糖但无 DKA、低血糖、脓毒症和软组织感染的住院情况很少见,且在所有组中相似。由于泵故障导致的住院,其严重程度分类为主要严重程度(14.7%)的比例更高,但 LOS(1.60 天,95%CI 1.55-1.65)和医疗费用(13078 美元,95%CI 12549-13608 美元)最低。
尽管胰岛素泵在美国的使用越来越普遍,但记录在案的使用胰岛素泵的儿科住院患者比例仍然较低,这可能代表编码不完整。与非胰岛素泵使用者相比,胰岛素泵使用者的 DKA 入院率较低。需要改进在行政数据中识别胰岛素泵使用者的编码实践和其他方法,并采取干预措施降低 DKA 的风险。