School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Jun;30(3):343-351. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12850. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
To investigate whether practice rurality and rural training pathway are associated with general practitioner registrars' participation in their practice's after-hours care roster.
A cross-sectional analysis of data (2017-2019) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training study, an ongoing inception cohort study of Australian general practitioner registrars. The principal analyses used logistic regression.
Three national general practitioner regional training organisations across 3 Australian states.
General practitioner registrars in training within regional training organisations.
Involvement in practice after-hours care was indicated by a dichotomous response on a 6-monthly Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training study questionnaire item.
1576 registrars provided 3158 observations (response rate 90.3%). Of these, 1574 (48.6% [95% confidence interval: 46.8-50.3]) involved registrars contributing to their practice's after-hours roster. In major cities, 40% of registrar terms involved contribution to their practice's after-hours roster; in regional and remote practices, 62% contributed to the after-hours roster. On multivariable analysis, both level of rurality of practice (odds ratio(OR) 1.75, P = .007; and OR 1.74, P = .026 for inner regional and outer regional/remote locations, respectively, versus major city) and rural training pathway of registrar (OR 1.65, P = .008) were significantly associated with more after-hours roster contribution. Other associations were registrars' later training stage, larger practices and practices not routinely bulk billing. Significant regional variability in after-hours care was identified (after adjusting for rurality).
These findings suggest that registrars working rurally and those training on the rural pathway are more often participating in practice after-hours rosters. This has workforce implications, and implications for the educational richness of registrars' training environment.
调查从业地点的农村属性和农村培训途径是否与全科医生住院医师参与其执业后的值班安排有关。
对澳大利亚全科医生住院医师注册临床培训研究(一项正在进行的澳大利亚全科医生住院医师初始队列研究)2017-2019 年数据的横断面分析。主要分析采用逻辑回归。
澳大利亚三个州的三个国家全科医生区域培训组织。
培训中的全科医生住院医师。
通过注册临床培训研究每 6 个月一次的问卷项目中的二分响应来表示参与执业后的值班。
1576 名住院医师提供了 3158 次观察(响应率 90.3%)。其中,1574 名(48.6%[95%置信区间:46.8-50.3])参与了其执业后的值班。在大城市,40%的住院医师任期涉及参与其执业后的值班;在区域和偏远地区,62%的住院医师参与了值班。多变量分析显示,执业地点的农村属性(比值比[OR]1.75,P = 0.007;OR 1.74,P = 0.026,分别对应于内部区域和外部区域/偏远地区与大城市相比)和住院医师的农村培训途径(OR 1.65,P = 0.008)与更多的夜间值班安排显著相关。其他关联因素包括住院医师的培训后期阶段、更大的实践规模和不常规批量计费的实践。在调整农村属性后,发现夜间护理存在显著的区域差异。
这些发现表明,在农村工作和接受农村培训途径的住院医师更经常参与实践后的值班安排。这对劳动力有影响,也对住院医师培训环境的教育丰富性有影响。