Boksman L, Jordan R E, Suzuki M, Charles D H
J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 May;112(5):627-31. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0082.
Seventy-nine Class I and II light-cured composite resin restorations were evaluated for 3 years. Although the composite resin was not totally wear resistant, its overall clinical performance was acceptable, relative to most parameters of evaluation. The use of such a material in the posterior region may be justified in situations in which appearance is important, ideal circumstances predominate over conservative cavity design, and the patient understands the benefits and limitations of the procedure.
对79颗I类和II类光固化复合树脂修复体进行了3年的评估。尽管复合树脂并非完全耐磨，但相对于大多数评估参数而言，其总体临床性能是可以接受的。在美观很重要、理想情况比保守洞型设计更占优势且患者了解该治疗方法的益处和局限性的情况下，在后牙区域使用这种材料可能是合理的。
