School of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK.
Institute of Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, University of Huddersfield, UK.
J Wound Care. 2022 Mar 2;31(3):208-216. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.3.208.
To assess the effectiveness of sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) assessment technology as an adjunct to visual assessment to reduce pressure ulcer (PU) incidence alongside standard PU care pathways.
Data were obtained from wards located within 28 institutions in the UK, Canada, Belgium, Spain and Ireland. At each ward, the proportion of patients scanned who were observed to have one or more PUs of Category 2 or above during a pre-Pressure Ulcer Reduction Programme (PURP) implementation period starting between November 2017 and July 2018 was recorded. The proportion of patients scanned who were observed to have one or more PUs of Category 2 or above during a post-PURP implementation period starting between November 2018 and July 2019 was also recorded. A meta-analysis was conducted on the data using wards as the unit of analysis, to facilitate overall estimate of the PURP. A sensitivity study was also conducted to assess the sensitivity of results to data from specific institutions.
A synthesised estimate of the overall relative risk (RR) was calculated to be 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.56). Hence the risk of PU in the post-PURP cohort was about one-third that of the corresponding risk in the pre-PURP cohort. The sensitivity analysis revealed no evidence that any individual ward exerted excessive influence on the findings.
The analysis has revealed strong evidence that implementation of the PURP was associated with reduction in incidence of Category 2 or above PUs across a wide range of clinical settings.
评估亚表皮水分(SEM)评估技术作为视觉评估的辅助手段,以降低压力性溃疡(PU)发生率,并结合标准的 PU 护理路径。
数据来自英国、加拿大、比利时、西班牙和爱尔兰的 28 家机构的病房。在每个病房中,记录了在 2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 7 月开始的压力溃疡预防计划(PURP)实施前期间内,接受扫描的患者中观察到一个或多个 2 级或以上类别 PU 的比例;在 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 7 月开始的 PURP 实施后期间内,观察到一个或多个 2 级或以上类别 PU 的患者比例。对数据进行了荟萃分析,以病房为分析单位,以促进对 PURP 的总体估计。还进行了敏感性研究,以评估结果对特定机构数据的敏感性。
计算出的总体相对风险(RR)综合估计值为 0.38(95%置信区间 0.26 至 0.56)。因此,PURP 后队列中 PU 的风险约为 PURP 前队列中相应风险的三分之一。敏感性分析表明,没有证据表明任何单个病房对研究结果产生了过度影响。
分析结果表明,在广泛的临床环境中,实施 PURP 与降低 2 级或以上 PU 的发生率之间存在强有力的证据。