Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR/CIMAR LA), University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), Av. Brasília, 1449-006 Lisbon, Portugal.
Mar Drugs. 2022 Feb 15;20(2):143. doi: 10.3390/md20020143.
The analysis of marine lipophilic toxins in shellfish products still represents a challenging task due to the complexity and diversity of the sample matrix. Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the technique of choice for accurate quantitative measurements in complex samples. By combining unambiguous identification with the high selectivity of tandem MS, it provides the required high sensitivity and specificity. However, LC-MS is prone to matrix effects (ME) that need to be evaluated during the development and validation of methods. Furthermore, the large sample-to-sample variability, even between samples of the same species and geographic origin, needs a procedure to evaluate and control ME continuously. Here, we analyzed the toxins okadaic acid (OA), dinophysistoxins (DTX-1 and DTX-2), pectenotoxin (PTX-2), yessotoxin (YTX) and azaspiracid-1 (AZA-1). Samples were mussels (), both fresh and processed, and a toxin-free mussel reference material. We developed an accurate mass-extracted ion chromatogram (AM-XIC) based quantitation method using an Orbitrap instrument, evaluated the ME for different types and extracts of mussel samples, characterized the main compounds co-eluting with the targeted molecules and quantified toxins in samples by following a standard addition method (SAM). An AM-XIC based quantitation of lipophilic toxins in mussel samples using high resolution and accuracy full scan profiles (LC-HR-MS) is a good alternative to multi reaction monitoring (MRM) for instruments with HR capabilities. ME depend on the starting sample matrix and the sample preparation. ME are particularly strong for OA and related toxins, showing values below 50% for fresh mussel samples. Results for other toxins (AZA-1, YTX and PTX-2) are between 75% and 110%. ME in unknown matrices can be evaluated by comparing their full scan LC-HR-MS profiles with those of known samples with known ME. ME can be corrected by following SAM with AM-XIC quantitation if necessary.
贝类产品中脂溶性贝类毒素的分析仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务,这是由于样品基质的复杂性和多样性所致。液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS)是复杂样品中准确定量测量的首选技术。通过将明确的鉴定与串联质谱的高选择性相结合,它提供了所需的高灵敏度和特异性。然而,LC-MS 容易受到基质效应(ME)的影响,在方法的开发和验证过程中需要对其进行评估。此外,即使是同一物种和地理来源的样品之间,也存在很大的样品间变异性,需要有一种程序来连续评估和控制 ME。在这里,我们分析了贝类毒素 okadaic acid(OA)、dinophysistoxins(DTX-1 和 DTX-2)、pectenotoxin(PTX-2)、yessotoxin(YTX)和 azaspiracid-1(AZA-1)。样品为贻贝(),包括新鲜贻贝和加工贻贝,以及一种无贝类毒素贻贝参考物质。我们使用轨道阱仪器开发了一种基于精确质量提取离子色谱(AM-XIC)的定量方法,评估了不同类型和提取物的贻贝样品中的 ME,表征了与目标分子共洗脱的主要化合物,并通过标准添加法(SAM)对样品中的毒素进行定量。使用高分辨率和精确质量全扫描图谱(LC-HR-MS)的贻贝样品中脂溶性贝类毒素的 AM-XIC 定量是具有 HR 功能的仪器进行多反应监测(MRM)的良好替代方法。ME 取决于起始样品基质和样品制备。对于新鲜贻贝样品,OA 和相关毒素的 ME 特别强烈,其值低于 50%。其他毒素(AZA-1、YTX 和 PTX-2)的结果在 75%到 110%之间。可以通过将未知基质的全扫描 LC-HR-MS 图谱与具有已知 ME 的已知样品的图谱进行比较来评估其 ME。如果需要,可以通过 AM-XIC 定量的 SAM 来校正 ME。