Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina, Italy.
Orthodontics Department, School of Dentistry, University of Genova, Italy.
Eur J Orthod. 2022 Sep 19;44(5):530-536. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac007.
This retrospective CBCT study aimed to evaluate the palatal anatomical characteristics using the third palatal ruga as a reliable clinical reference for miniscrew placement.
Thirty-six subjects (mean age17.1 y.o. ± 4.1) were randomly selected and their records (CBCT volume and maxillary digital models) were included.BlueSkyPlan CBCT software viewer (BluSkyBio, V4.7) was used to measure the following outcomes at the level of third palatal ruga, 2 mm anteriorly and 2 mm posteriorly: total bone depth, cortical bone thickness, and mucosa thickness. The outcomes were evaluated on lines perpendicular to the palatal mucosa laying on different sagittal planes: the mid-palatal plane, 2 and 4 mm paramedian planes.
The maximum mean amount of bone depth was registered 2 mm posteriorly to the third ruga and 4 mm paramedian (9.7 mm). No significant difference was observed between the third ruga insertion site and its corresponding 2 mm posterior site. Cortical bone of palatal vault did not change significantly in anteroposterior direction for all the considered sites. Significant differences were found comparing cortical bone at the suture level with cortical bone 2-mm and 4-mm paramedian at all anteroposterior levels. Palatal mucosa increases its thickness in paramedian insertion sites, and it decreases in posterior insertion sites.
Both third palatal ruga and 2 mm posteriorly to third ruga (4 mm paramedian) could be the optimal insertion site for palatal miniscrew placement, depending on individual anatomic conditions. The thickness of the cortical palatal bone showed, at 4 mm paramedian, optimal characteristics for miniscrew primary stability. Palatal mucosa thickness values suggest miniscrew neck extension of 2.0-2.5 mm for optimal mucosa adaptation.
本回顾性 CBCT 研究旨在通过第三腭皱襞评估腭部解剖结构特征,将其作为腭部微型种植体植入的可靠临床参考。
随机选择 36 名受试者(平均年龄 17.1 岁±4.1 岁),纳入其记录(CBCT 容积和上颌数字模型)。使用 BlueSkyPlan CBCT 软件查看器(BluSkyBio,V4.7)在第三腭皱襞水平、前 2mm 和后 2mm 处测量以下结果:总骨深度、皮质骨厚度和黏膜厚度。在与腭黏膜垂直的不同矢状面上评估结果:正中腭平面、2mm 和 4mm 旁正中平面。
最大平均骨深度位于第三皱襞后 2mm 和 4mm 旁正中(9.7mm)。在第三皱襞插入部位与其相应的后 2mm 部位之间未观察到显著差异。所有考虑的部位,腭穹窿的皮质骨在前后方向上没有明显变化。在所有前后水平上,在缝间水平的皮质骨与 2mm 和 4mm 旁正中的皮质骨比较时,发现有显著差异。在旁正中插入部位,腭黏膜厚度增加,在后部插入部位,腭黏膜厚度减少。
第三腭皱襞和第三皱襞后 2mm(4mm 旁正中)都可以是腭部微型种植体植入的最佳插入部位,这取决于个体的解剖条件。4mm 旁正中的腭骨皮质厚度表现出最佳的微型种植体初始稳定性特征。腭黏膜厚度值表明微型种植体颈部延长 2.0-2.5mm 可实现最佳黏膜适应。