Rastogi Shruti, Kalaiselvan Vivekanandan, Bin Jardan Yousef A, Zameer Saima, Sarwat Maryam
Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Noida 201313, India.
Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, Ghaziabad 201002, India.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Feb 21;11(2):340. doi: 10.3390/biology11020340.
The primary prophylaxis with filgrastim (FIL) and pegfilgrastim (PEG-F) is recommended to decrease the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The commonly reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with FIL and PEG-F is bone pain. ADRs pertaining to FIL and PEG-F were extracted from the European EudraVigilance (EV) database. The Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) obtained from EV database that reported FIL and PEG-F as the suspected drug were analyzed. Registered ADRs (from the groups "General disorders and administration site conditions", "Blood and lymphatic system disorders", "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders" and "Investigations") for FIL and PEG-F were collected from EV database from 2007 to 5 June 2021. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to calculate ICSRs with most common ADRs related to FIL and PEG-F. A total of 17,403 ICSRs described the incidence of most common ADRs of FIL and PEG-F. The commonly reported ADRs for both drugs were pyrexia, bone pain, back pain, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The odds ratio of ICSRs belonging to the System Organ Class (SOC) "Investigations" (ROR 1.01 (CI 0.93-1.10)) revealed no significant difference in FIL and PEG-F. However, for the SOCs (General disorders and administration site conditions" and "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders" ((ROR 1.14 (CI 1.06-1.21); ROR 1.21 (CI 1.18-1.32), respectively), an increased reporting probability with PEG-F was found. The authors reported a lower reporting probability for the SOC "Blood and lymphatic system disorders" for FIL versus PEG-F (ROR 0.75 (CI 0.70-0.80)). Our results have demonstrated that the occurrence of bone pain was similar with FIL and PEG-F. For the incidence of pyrexia and back pain, PEG-F was associated with a higher reporting probability as compared to FIL. However, the incidence of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was higher in FIL compared to PEG-F. Further evaluation of data from real life is needed.
推荐使用非格司亭(FIL)和聚乙二醇化非格司亭(PEG-F)进行一级预防,以减轻化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症(CIN)的严重程度。FIL和PEG-F常见的药物不良反应(ADR)是骨痛。从欧洲药物警戒数据库(EV)中提取与FIL和PEG-F相关的ADR。对从EV数据库获得的将FIL和PEG-F列为可疑药物的个体病例安全报告(ICSR)进行分析。从2007年至2021年6月5日的EV数据库中收集FIL和PEG-F的注册ADR(来自“全身性疾病和给药部位状况”、“血液和淋巴系统疾病”、“肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病”以及“检查”组)。报告比值比(ROR)用于计算与FIL和PEG-F相关的最常见ADR的ICSR。共有17403份ICSR描述了FIL和PEG-F最常见ADR发生率。两种药物常见的ADR是发热、骨痛、背痛、中性粒细胞减少症和发热性中性粒细胞减少症。属于“检查”系统器官分类(SOC)的ICSR的比值比(ROR 1.01(95%CI 0.93-1.10))显示FIL和PEG-F之间无显著差异。然而,对于“全身性疾病和给药部位状况”以及“肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病”这两个SOC(ROR分别为1.14(95%CI 1.06-1.21);ROR 1.21(95%CI 1.18-1.32)),发现PEG-F的报告概率增加。作者报告FIL相对于PEG-F在“血液和淋巴系统疾病”SOC中的报告概率较低(ROR 0.75(95%CI 0.70-0.80))。我们的结果表明,FIL和PEG-F发生骨痛的情况相似。就发热和背痛的发生率而言,与FIL相比,PEG-F的报告概率更高。然而,与PEG-F相比,FIL中中性粒细胞减少症和发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率更高。需要对来自现实生活的数据进行进一步评估。