Regier Dean A, Chan Brandon, Costa Sarah, Scott David W, Steidl Christian, Connors Joseph M, Karsan Aly, Marra Marco A, Kridel Robert, Cromwell Ian, Pollard Samantha
Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4C2, Canada.
School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;14(4):908. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040908.
Classifying diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into cell-of-origin (COO) subtypes could allow for personalized cancer control. Evidence suggests that subtype-guided treatment may be beneficial in the activated B-cell (ABC) subtype of DLBCL, among patients under the age of 60.
We estimated the cost-effectiveness of age- and subtype-specific treatment guided by gene expression profiling (GEP). A probabilistic Markov model examined costs and quality-adjusted life-years gained (QALY) accrued to patients under GEP-classified COO treatment over a 10-year time horizon. The model was calibrated to evaluate the adoption of ibrutinib as a first line treatment among patients under 60 years with ABC subtype DLBCL. The primary data source for efficacy was derived from published estimates of the PHOENIX trial. These inputs were supplemented with patient-level, real-world data from BC Cancer, which provides comprehensive cancer services to the population of British Columbia.
We found the cost-effectiveness of GEP-guided treatment vs. standard care was $77,806 per QALY (24.3% probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $50,000/QALY; 53.7% probability at a WTP of $100,000/QALY) for first-line treatment. Cost-effectiveness was dependent on assumptions around decision-makers' WTP and the cost of the assay.
We encourage further clinical trials to reduce uncertainty around the implementation of GEP-classified COO personalized treatment in this patient population.
将弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)分类为细胞起源(COO)亚型有助于实现个性化癌症控制。有证据表明,对于60岁以下的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,亚型指导的治疗可能对激活B细胞(ABC)亚型有益。
我们评估了由基因表达谱(GEP)指导的年龄和亚型特异性治疗的成本效益。一个概率马尔可夫模型检查了在10年时间范围内,接受GEP分类的COO治疗的患者所产生的成本和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)。该模型经过校准,以评估在60岁以下的ABC亚型弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中采用伊布替尼作为一线治疗的情况。疗效的主要数据来源来自已发表的PHOENIX试验估计值。这些输入数据还补充了来自不列颠哥伦比亚癌症机构的患者层面的真实世界数据,该机构为不列颠哥伦比亚省的居民提供全面的癌症服务。
我们发现,对于一线治疗,GEP指导的治疗与标准治疗相比,每获得一个QALY的成本效益为77,806美元(在支付意愿(WTP)为50,000美元/QALY时,成本效益的概率为24.3%;在支付意愿为100,000美元/QALY时,概率为53.7%)。成本效益取决于围绕决策者支付意愿和检测成本的假设。
我们鼓励进一步开展临床试验,以减少在该患者群体中实施GEP分类的COO个性化治疗的不确定性。