Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Science and Technology George Emil Palade, 540139 Târgu-Mureș, Romania.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1966. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041966.
Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months in comparison with a resin-based sealant.
We included 32 children in the study, with ages between six and eight years and an average age of 6.8 years old. For each child, we sealed four permanent molars (totaling 128 teeth). The study group was divided into sub-groups. Sub-group A was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with composite resin-based fissure sealant, Helioseal F™, and sub-group B was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with glass carbomer cement, GCP Glass Seal™. The sealants were assessed clinically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
The 6-month follow-up evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between the two materials neither regarding sealant retention nor new carious lesions formation ( > 0.05). At the 12-month recall, 57 molars had good retention (89.06%) from sub-group A and 44 molars (68.75%) from sub-group B; there was a statistically significant difference ( = 0.0187) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. At the last recall after 2 years, sub-group A had a higher number of molars with perfect sealing (47-73.43%) and 8 molars (12.5%) with new caries lesions and sub-group B had 23 (35.93%) molars with perfect sealing and 15 molars (23.44%) with new caries lesions; there was a statistically significant difference ( < 0.0001) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention.
The glass carbomer retention is very inferior to the resin-based material. The glass carbomer sealant was effective in preventing new caries development, comparable with the conventional resin-based sealant.
评估玻璃离子水门汀(glass carbomer)和复合树脂(resin-based)两种窝沟封闭剂在 24 个月时的保留率和继发龋的发生率。
纳入年龄 6-8 岁(平均 6.8 岁)的 32 名儿童,对其共 128 颗恒磨牙进行窝沟封闭,随机分为两组:A 组(n=64)用复合树脂 Helioseal F 进行窝沟封闭,B 组(n=64)用玻璃离子水门汀 GCP Glass Seal 进行窝沟封闭。在 6、12、18、24 个月时进行临床检查。
6 个月时两种材料的保留率和新发龋无统计学差异(>0.05)。12 个月时 A 组 57 颗(89.06%)、B 组 44 颗(68.75%)保留完整,差异有统计学意义(=0.0187)。24 个月时 A 组 47-73.43%的窝沟封闭剂完整,8 颗牙(12.5%)发生新龋,B 组 23 颗(35.93%)窝沟封闭剂完整,15 颗牙(23.44%)发生新龋,差异有统计学意义(<0.0001)。
玻璃离子水门汀的保留率显著低于复合树脂。玻璃离子水门汀在预防继发龋方面与传统的复合树脂效果相当。