Faculty of Nursing, Campus de los Jerónimos s/n., Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Psychiatric Hospitalization, University Morales Meseguer Hospital, 30008 Murcia, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2014. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042014.
To create and analyze an instrument to assess the possible agitation triggers of hospitalized psychiatric patients.
No tools exist for identifying according to a professional's experience.
Descriptive and cross-sectional study. The questionnaire of possible triggers of agitation behaviors of patients hospitalized in psychiatric wards according to professional experience (TAPE) was designed and analyzed.
The questionnaire was provided to 156 mental health workers (76.9% women, average work experience: 10.15 ± 8 years, 46.8% were nurses specialized in mental health, and 21.2% psychiatrists). A good internal consistency was obtained, with a Cronbach α value of 0.791 in the initial test, and 0.892 in the retest. The factorial analysis found four factors: factor 1 "personnel", factor 2 "routines", factor 3 "norms-infrastructure", and factor 4 "clinic". Factor 1 obtained the highest value, with a mean of 4.16 ± 0.63, highlighting the item "lack of specialized personnel" (mean 4.38 ± 0.81). The specialized professionals provided higher scores to the items from the factors associated with the training of the personnel and routines ( = 0.017; = 0.042).
The TAPE questionnaire is useful for identifying the possible triggers that could lead to situations of agitation of hospitalized patients.
创建和分析一种评估住院精神病患者可能激越触发因素的工具。
目前尚无工具可根据专业经验进行识别。
描述性和横断面研究。根据专业经验(TAPE)设计并分析了评估住院精神病患者激越行为可能触发因素的问卷。
该问卷提供给 156 名精神卫生工作者(76.9%为女性,平均工作经验:10.15±8 年,46.8%为精神科护士,21.2%为精神科医生)。初始测试的 Cronbach α 值为 0.791,重测时为 0.892,内部一致性良好。因子分析发现了四个因素:因素 1“人员”,因素 2“常规”,因素 3“规范-基础设施”和因素 4“临床”。因素 1的得分最高,平均值为 4.16±0.63,突出了“缺乏专业人员”这一项(平均值为 4.38±0.81)。专业人员对与人员培训和常规相关的因素的项目评分更高( = 0.017; = 0.042)。
TAPE 问卷可用于识别可能导致住院患者激越的潜在触发因素。