• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致“胎盘迁移”的技术因素:超声评估

Technical factors responsible for "placental migration": sonographic assessment.

作者信息

Townsend R R, Laing F C, Nyberg D A, Jeffrey R B, Wing V W

出版信息

Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):105-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3520642.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.160.1.3520642
PMID:3520642
Abstract

Whether placental migration occurs is debatable. To determine the incidence of placenta previa in early pregnancy and the frequency of placental migration, a retrospective analysis was undertaken of 2,087 consecutive obstetrical sonograms obtained during a 23-month period. Among 849 patients scanned between 14 and 26 weeks after conception, placenta previa was diagnosed using ultrasonography (US) in 53 patients (6.2%). This diagnosis was confirmed at surgery in 15 patients (1.8%); there were 12 cases of central previa and three cases of partial previa. Retrospective analysis revealed that in 25 cases, technical factors, such as an overly distended urinary bladder (19 cases) or focal uterine contractions (six cases), were responsible for the false-positive diagnoses. In the 13 remaining patients, however, there were no obvious technical difficulties to account for the diagnosis of previa. Migration did not occur in any of the patients with central previa. It appears that placental migration may occur, although less frequently than has previously been reported. Furthermore, this study suggests that migration does not occur in patients with central previa.

摘要

胎盘是否会发生迁移仍存在争议。为了确定妊娠早期前置胎盘的发生率以及胎盘迁移的频率,我们对在23个月期间连续获得的2087例产科超声检查进行了回顾性分析。在849例受孕后14至26周接受扫描的患者中,通过超声检查(US)诊断出53例前置胎盘(6.2%)。15例患者(1.8%)在手术中得到证实;其中有12例中央性前置胎盘和3例部分性前置胎盘。回顾性分析显示,在25例中,技术因素,如膀胱过度充盈(19例)或局部子宫收缩(6例),是导致假阳性诊断的原因。然而,在其余13例患者中,没有明显的技术困难来解释前置胎盘的诊断。中央性前置胎盘患者中没有一例发生迁移。似乎胎盘迁移可能会发生,尽管其频率低于先前报道。此外,这项研究表明中央性前置胎盘患者不会发生迁移。

相似文献

1
Technical factors responsible for "placental migration": sonographic assessment.导致“胎盘迁移”的技术因素:超声评估
Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):105-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3520642.
2
The fallacy of placental migration: effect of sonographic techniques.胎盘迁移的谬误:超声技术的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Jan;144(1):79-81. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.1.79.
3
Accuracy of placental localization by ultrasound.超声检查胎盘定位的准确性。
Radiology. 1978 Jul;128(1):177-80. doi: 10.1148/128.1.177.
4
Ultrasound placental localisation in early pregnancy.
Scott Med J. 1987 Feb;32(1):19-21. doi: 10.1177/003693308703200109.
5
Potential placenta previa: definition, frequency, and significance.前置胎盘的可能性:定义、发生率及意义。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Nov;149(5):1013-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.5.1013.
6
The identification of placenta praevia.前置胎盘的识别。
Radiology. 1978 Jul;128(1):255-6. doi: 10.1148/128.1.255.
7
Second trimester placenta previa. An apparently normal placentation.孕中期前置胎盘。胎盘植入看似正常。
Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Dec;50(6):706-9.
8
Early diagnosis of placenta previa.前置胎盘的早期诊断。
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Aug;54(2):231-4.
9
Diagnosis of placenta previa by ultrasonography: a review at Ramathibodi Hospital.超声检查诊断前置胎盘:拉玛蒂博迪医院的综述
J Med Assoc Thai. 1990 Feb;73 Suppl 1:69-72.
10
[Ultrasonographic early diagnosis of placenta praevia and its clinical value].[前置胎盘的超声早期诊断及其临床价值]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1985 Oct;45(10):710-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036121.