• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

289953例肌肉骨骼疾病患者中春那手法治疗的安全性:一项回顾性研究

Safety of Chuna Manipulation Therapy in 289,953 Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Kim Suna, Kim Gook-Beom, Kim Hyo-Jun, Park Joon, Lee Ji-Won, Jeong Wu-Jin, Kim Hye-Gyeong, Kim Min-Young, Park Kyoung-Sun, Lee Jinho, Lee Jun-Hwan, Shin Joon-Shik, Shin Byung-Cheul, Ha In-Hyuk

机构信息

Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Daejeon 35263, Korea.

Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundations, Seoul 06110, Korea.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;10(2):294. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020294.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare10020294
PMID:35206908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8871927/
Abstract

Studies have reported that mild adverse events (AEs) are common after manual therapy and that there is a risk of serious injury. We aimed to assess the safety of Chuna manipulation therapy (CMT), a traditional manual Korean therapy, by analysing AEs in patients who underwent this treatment. Patients who received at least one session of CMT between December 2009 and March 2019 at 14 Korean medicine hospitals were included. Electronic patient charts and internal audit data obtained from situation report logs were retrospectively analysed. All data were reviewed by two researchers. The inter-rater agreement was assessed using the Cohen's kappa coefficient, and reliability analysis among hospitals was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. In total, 2,682,258 CMT procedures were performed in 289,953 patients during the study period. There were 50 AEs, including worsened pain ( = 29), rib fracture ( = 11), falls during treatment ( = 6), chest pain ( = 2), dizziness ( = 1), and unpleasant feeling ( = 1). The incidence of mild to moderate AEs was 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-2.39) per 100,000 treatment sessions, and that of severe AEs was 0.04 (95% CI 0.00-0.16) per 100,000 treatment sessions. Thus, AEs of any level of severity were very rare after CMT. Moreover, there were no instances of carotid artery dissection or spinal cord injury, which are the most severe AEs associated with manual therapy in other countries.

摘要

研究报告称,手法治疗后轻度不良事件(AE)很常见,且存在严重受伤的风险。我们旨在通过分析接受这种治疗的患者的不良事件,评估传统韩国手法治疗——推拿整复疗法(CMT)的安全性。纳入了2009年12月至2019年3月期间在14家韩医医院接受至少一次CMT治疗的患者。对从情况报告日志中获取的电子病历和内部审计数据进行了回顾性分析。所有数据由两名研究人员进行审查。使用科恩kappa系数评估评分者间的一致性,并使用克朗巴赫α系数评估医院间的可靠性分析。在研究期间,共对289,953名患者进行了2,682,258次CMT治疗。发生了50起不良事件,包括疼痛加重(n = 29)、肋骨骨折(n = 11)、治疗期间跌倒(n = 6)、胸痛(n = 2)、头晕(n = 1)和不适感(n = 1)。轻度至中度不良事件的发生率为每100,000次治疗1.83例(95%置信区间[CI] 1.36 - 2.39),重度不良事件的发生率为每100,000次治疗0.04例(95%CI 0.00 - 0.16)。因此,CMT后任何严重程度的不良事件都非常罕见。此外,没有发生颈动脉夹层或脊髓损伤的情况,而在其他国家,这些是与手法治疗相关的最严重不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5a/8871927/5cb11da032e1/healthcare-10-00294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5a/8871927/5cb11da032e1/healthcare-10-00294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5a/8871927/5cb11da032e1/healthcare-10-00294-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety of Chuna Manipulation Therapy in 289,953 Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Retrospective Study.289953例肌肉骨骼疾病患者中春那手法治疗的安全性:一项回顾性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;10(2):294. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020294.
2
Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.中医整脊手法治疗慢性颈痛的比较疗效与经济学评价:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3016-6.
3
Effectiveness of Chuna (or Tuina) Manual Therapy for Temporomandibular Disorder: A Systematic Review.整骨(或推拿)手法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的有效性:一项系统评价。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):258-268.
4
Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Chuna 手法治疗与常规常规护理治疗非急性腰痛的疗效比较:一项先导随机对照试验。
Trials. 2019 Apr 15;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y.
5
The effectiveness and safety of Chuna manual therapy on scoliosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Chuna 手法治疗脊柱侧凸的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 5;100(9):e24778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024778.
6
Comparison of concordance between chuna manual therapy diagnosis methods (palpation, X-ray, artificial intelligence program) in lumbar spine: An exploratory, cross-sectional, prospective observational study protocol.中文版研究方案:探讨性、横断面、前瞻性观察研究方案,比较推拿手法诊断方法(触诊、X 射线、人工智能程序)在腰椎中的一致性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28177. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028177.
7
Safety of Acupuncture and Pharmacopuncture in 80,523 Musculoskeletal Disorder Patients: A Retrospective Review of Internal Safety Inspection and Electronic Medical Records.80523例肌肉骨骼疾病患者接受针灸和药物穴位注射的安全性:内部安全检查和电子病历的回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3635. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003635.
8
Comparison of Concordance between Chuna Manual Therapy Diagnostic Methods (Palpation, X-ray, Artificial Intelligence Program) in Lumbar Spine: An Exploratory, Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.腰椎推拿整复疗法诊断方法(触诊、X线、人工智能程序)之间的一致性比较:一项探索性横断面临床研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;12(11):2732. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112732.
9
Can a Traditional Korean Manual Therapy Be a Complementary and Alternative Strategy for Cervicogenic Dizziness? A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.传统韩国手法治疗能否成为颈源性眩晕的补充和替代策略?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jun 3;2018:1062593. doi: 10.1155/2018/1062593. eCollection 2018.
10
Chuna Manual Therapy vs Usual Care for Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.推拿手法治疗与常规护理治疗非特异性慢性颈痛患者的随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2113757. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13757.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the utilisation of Chuna manual therapy for musculoskeletal disorders after its coverage under national health insurance in Korea: a retrospective analysis.韩国国家健康保险覆盖下用于肌肉骨骼疾病的春那手法治疗的利用情况分析:一项回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 8;15(8):e094099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094099.
2
A comparative effectiveness study of usual care, simple Chuna manual therapy, and complex Chuna manual therapy for the treatment of pelvic biomechanical lesions in patients with non-acute low back pain: a protocol for multicenter, randomized controlled trial.一项针对非急性腰痛患者骨盆生物力学病变的常规治疗、单纯韩式手法治疗和复杂韩式手法治疗的疗效比较研究:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04653-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.脊柱手法治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 13;364:l689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l689.
2
Osteopathic care for spinal complaints: A systematic literature review.整骨疗法治疗脊柱疾病:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206284. eCollection 2018.
3
What are the risks of manual treatment of the spine? A scoping review for clinicians.
Integrative Korean medicine treatment for low back pain with radiculopathy caused by Bertolotti syndrome: A CARE-compliant article and retrospective review of medical records.基于 CARE 指南的整合韩医学疗法治疗 Bertolotti 综合征所致神经根病性下腰痛:病例回顾性研究和病历回顾
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e39720. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039720.
4
A retrospective analysis of the incidence of severe adverse events among recipients of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy.对接受整脊脊柱手法治疗的患者严重不良事件发生率的回顾性分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 23;13(1):1254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28520-4.
脊柱手法治疗的风险有哪些?针对临床医生的一项范围综述
Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Dec 7;25:37. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0168-5. eCollection 2017.
4
Considerations to improve the safety of cervical spine manual therapy.改善颈椎手法治疗安全性的注意事项。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Feb;33:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
The Prevalence, Patterns, and Predictors of Chiropractic Use Among US Adults: Results From the 2012 National Health Interview Survey.美国成年人中脊椎按摩疗法的使用情况、模式和预测因素:2012 年全国健康访谈调查结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1810-1816. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002218.
6
The risk associated with spinal manipulation: an overview of reviews.脊柱推拿相关风险:综述概述
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 24;6(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0458-y.
7
Adverse events associated with the use of cervical spine manipulation or mobilization and patient characteristics: A systematic review.与颈椎手法治疗或松动相关的不良事件及患者特征:系统综述。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Apr;28:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
Exploring approaches to patient safety: the case of spinal manipulation therapy.探索患者安全的方法:以脊柱推拿疗法为例。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Jun 2;16:164. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1149-2.
9
Effect of routine diagnostic imaging for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A meta-analysis.常规影像学诊断对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Oct;26(8):585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.脊柱推拿手法与常规医疗护理治疗急慢性下腰痛的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 15;40(4):209-17. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000724.