• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现代心脏导管实验室中乙酰胆碱的应用:一项系统评价。

Acetylcholine Use in Modern Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Marrone Andrea, Pavasini Rita, Scollo Ennio, Gibiino Federico, Pompei Graziella, Caglioni Serena, Biscaglia Simone, Campo Gianluca, Tebaldi Matteo

机构信息

Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 21;11(4):1129. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041129.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11041129
PMID:35207403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8880288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of acetylcholine for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina is recommended by international guidelines. However, its intracoronary use is still off-label due to the absence of safety studies. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature to identify adverse events related to the intracoronary administration of acetylcholine for vasoreactivity testing to fill this gap.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials dealing with the intracoronary administration of acetylcholine. Articles were searched in MEDLINE (PubMed) using the MeSH strategy. Three independent reviewers determined whether the studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 434 articles were selected. Data concerning clinical characteristics, study population, acetylcholine dosage, and adverse effects were retrieved from the articles. Overall, 71,566 patients were included, of which only 382 (0.5%) developed one adverse event, and there were no fatal events reported (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary administration of acetylcholine in the setting of coronary spasm provocation testing is safe and plays a central role in the evaluation of coronary vasomotion disorders, making it worthy of becoming a part of clinical practice in all cardiac catheterization laboratories.

摘要

背景

国际指南推荐使用乙酰胆碱诊断血管痉挛性心绞痛。然而,由于缺乏安全性研究,其冠状动脉内使用仍属于超说明书用药。我们旨在对文献进行系统综述,以确定与冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱进行血管反应性测试相关的不良事件,从而填补这一空白。

方法与结果

我们对涉及冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱的观察性研究和随机对照试验进行了系统综述。使用医学主题词(MeSH)策略在MEDLINE(PubMed)中检索文章。三位独立评审员确定这些研究是否符合纳入和排除标准。共筛选出434篇文章。从这些文章中获取了有关临床特征、研究人群、乙酰胆碱剂量和不良反应的数据。总体而言,纳入了71566例患者,其中仅382例(0.5%)发生了1次不良事件,未报告致命事件(0%)。

结论

在冠状动脉痉挛激发试验中冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱是安全的,并且在评估冠状动脉血管运动障碍中起着核心作用,使其值得成为所有心脏导管实验室临床实践的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/871a33cbda89/jcm-11-01129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/43a709a72e03/jcm-11-01129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/d72cae9b45e8/jcm-11-01129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/871a33cbda89/jcm-11-01129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/43a709a72e03/jcm-11-01129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/d72cae9b45e8/jcm-11-01129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97e4/8880288/871a33cbda89/jcm-11-01129-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Acetylcholine Use in Modern Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories: A Systematic Review.现代心脏导管实验室中乙酰胆碱的应用:一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 21;11(4):1129. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041129.
2
Clinical usefulness, angiographic characteristics, and safety evaluation of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing among 921 consecutive white patients with unobstructed coronary arteries.921 例无阻塞性冠状动脉的白人患者中冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验的临床实用性、血管造影特征和安全性评估。
Circulation. 2014 Apr 29;129(17):1723-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004096. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
Feasibility and safety of outpatient cardiac catheterization with intracoronary acetylcholine provocation test.门诊心脏导管插入术联合冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验的可行性与安全性
Heart Vessels. 2018 Aug;33(8):846-852. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1139-z. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
Induction of coronary artery spasm by intracoronary acetylcholine: comparison with intracoronary ergonovine.冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱诱发冠状动脉痉挛:与冠状动脉内注射麦角新碱的比较。
Am Heart J. 1992 Jul;124(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90918-l.
5
New combined spasm provocation test in patients with rest angina: intracoronary injection of acetylcholine after intracoronary administration of ergonovine.静息型心绞痛患者新的联合痉挛激发试验:冠脉内给予麦角新碱后冠脉内注射乙酰胆碱。
Jpn Circ J. 2000 Aug;64(8):559-65. doi: 10.1253/jcj.64.559.
6
The 24-Month Prognosis of Patients With Positive or Intermediate Results in the Intracoronary Ergonovine Provocation Test.冠状动脉内麦角新碱激发试验阳性或中间结果患者的 24 个月预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(7):914-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.249. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
[Induction of coronary arterial spasm by intracoronary administration of acetylcholine in patients with vasospastic angina].[血管痉挛性心绞痛患者冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱诱发冠状动脉痉挛]
J Cardiol. 1989 Sep;19(3):749-55.
8
Feasibility of omitting provocation test with 50 μg of acetylcholine in left coronary artery.省略左冠状动脉内50μg乙酰胆碱激发试验的可行性。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Jun;32(6):685-689. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0926-7. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
[Cardiac events in vasospastic angina: site and morphology of coronary artery spasm is related to the long-term prognosis of vasospastic angina].[变异性心绞痛的心脏事件:冠状动脉痉挛的部位和形态与变异性心绞痛的长期预后相关]
J Cardiol. 1999 Apr;33(4):191-9.
10
Usefulness of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine as a provocative test for coronary artery spasm in patients with vasospastic angina.冠状动脉内注射乙酰胆碱作为变异性心绞痛患者冠状动脉痉挛激发试验的效用。
Heart Vessels. 1991;6(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/BF02058755.

引用本文的文献

1
Stability of Ready-to-Use Solutions of Acetylcholine for Intracoronary Provocative Testing.用于冠状动脉激发试验的乙酰胆碱即用型溶液的稳定性
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 27;10(1):110-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2024.09.010. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Invasive Evaluation for Coronary Vasospasm.冠状动脉痉挛的侵入性评估
US Cardiol. 2023 Jun 9;17:e07. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.33. eCollection 2023.
3
Coronary Spasm Testing with Acetylcholine: A Powerful Tool for a Personalized Therapy of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders.乙酰胆碱激发试验:冠状动脉痉挛检测——冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍个体化治疗的有力工具

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Vascular Dysfunction in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Why, How, and When.评估无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的血管功能障碍:为何、如何以及何时。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1847-1864. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.052.
2
Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): A Review of the Current Position.非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA):当前状况综述。
Cardiology. 2020;145(9):543-552. doi: 10.1159/000509100. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
3
Dose-Response Relationship Between Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Minimal Lumen Diameter in Coronary Endothelial Function Testing of Women and Men With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.
Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 22;14(3):292. doi: 10.3390/life14030292.
4
Diagnostic Puzzles and Cause-Targeted Treatment Strategies in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: An Updated Review.非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死的诊断难题及病因针对性治疗策略:最新综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 26;12(19):6198. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196198.
5
Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients with MINOCA.MINOCA 患者的当代诊断与管理。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Jun;25(6):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01874-x. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Role of Intracoronary Imaging in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Disease (MINOCA): A Review.冠状动脉内成像在非阻塞性冠心病心肌梗死(MINOCA)中的作用:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 8;12(6):2129. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062129.
女性和男性心绞痛且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的冠状动脉内皮功能测试中,冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱与最小管腔直径之间的剂量反应关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008587. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008587. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial.采用有创冠状动脉功能检测的分层医学治疗心绞痛:CorMicA 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2841-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
Editor's Choice- Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of MINOCA: an update.编辑精选- 心肌梗死不能分类为动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(MINOCA)的病理生理学、诊断和处理:更新。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Feb;8(1):54-62. doi: 10.1177/2048872618782414. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Long-Term Coronary Functional Assessment of the Infarct-Related Artery Treated With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: Insights of the TROFI II Trial.采用依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架或依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗的梗死相关动脉的长期冠状动脉功能评估:TROFI II 试验的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1559-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 24.
7
The effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning on coronary artery function in patients with stable coronary artery disease.远程缺血预处理对稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉功能的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;252:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.082.
8
Sex-Related Differences in Vasomotor Function in Patients With Angina and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries.血管舒缩功能在伴有心绞痛和无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者中的性别差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 7;70(19):2349-2358. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.016.
9
Stable coronary syndromes: pathophysiology, diagnostic advances and therapeutic need.稳定型冠状动脉综合征:病理生理学、诊断进展和治疗需求。
Heart. 2018 Feb;104(4):284-292. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311446. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Safety of intracoronary provocative testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm.冠状动脉痉挛诊断的冠状动脉内激发试验的安全性。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.109. Epub 2017 Jun 1.