Viveros-Carreño David, Rodriguez Juliana, Rendon Pereira Gabriel Jaime, Slama Jiri, Halaska Michael J, Robova Helena, Pareja Rene
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogota, Colombia.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Apr 4;32(4):486-493. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003297.
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the oncologic and fertility outcomes of patients with cervix-confined cancer >4 cm who underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery.
This study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021254816). PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and OVID databases were searched from inception to July 2021. The included patients were those with cancer confined to the cervix and tumor diameter >4 cm (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IB3) with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma who underwent intra-venous neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by successful fertility-sparing surgery.
The initial search identified 2990 articles. A total of 40 patients from 11 studies had attempted fertility preservation surgery (conization, simple or radical trachelectomy) and in 26 patients (65%) it was successful. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy. A complete pathological response occurred in 56% of patients and two patients (7.7%) had a recurrence. The 4.5-year disease-free survival was 92.3% and the 4.5-year overall survival rate was 100%. Of six patients who tried to conceive, four (67%) achieved at least one pregnancy and three of the five pregnancies (60%) were pre-term deliveries (all after radical trachelectomy). All patients with recurrence received cisplatin and ifosfamide instead of cisplatin and paclitaxel, underwent non-radical surgery, and had residual disease in the final specimen.
Evidence for fertility-sparing surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer and tumors >4 cm is limited, and this approach should be considered as an experimental intervention. As the use of non-radical surgery could be a risk factor, if neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is used, patients should undergo fertility-sparing radical surgery.
本系统评价的目的是评估接受新辅助化疗后行保留生育功能手术的宫颈局限性癌患者(肿瘤直径>4 cm)的肿瘤学及生育结局。
本研究在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号CRD42021254816)。检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、ClinicalTrials、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、SCOPUS和OVID数据库,检索时间从建库至2021年7月。纳入的患者为宫颈癌局限于宫颈且肿瘤直径>4 cm(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018年分期IB3期),病理类型为鳞状细胞癌、腺癌或腺鳞癌,接受静脉新辅助化疗后成功进行保留生育功能手术者。
初步检索共识别出2990篇文章。11项研究中的40例患者尝试进行保留生育功能手术(锥切术、单纯或根治性宫颈切除术),其中26例(65%)成功。所有患者均接受了铂类化疗。56%的患者出现完全病理缓解,2例患者(7.7%)复发。4.5年无病生存率为92.3%,4.5年总生存率为100%。6例尝试受孕的患者中,4例(67%)至少成功妊娠1次,5次妊娠中有3次(60%)为早产(均在根治性宫颈切除术后)。所有复发患者均接受顺铂和异环磷酰胺而非顺铂和紫杉醇治疗,接受了非根治性手术,且最终标本中有残留病灶。
对于宫颈癌且肿瘤直径>4 cm的患者,新辅助化疗后行保留生育功能手术的证据有限,该方法应被视为一种试验性干预措施。由于使用非根治性手术可能是一个危险因素,因此如果使用新辅助化疗,患者应接受保留生育功能的根治性手术。