Pourmoussa Austin J, Mahendra Ashwin M, Peña Constantino S, Powell Alex, Schiro Brian J, Herrera Raul, Katzen Barry T, Narayanan Govindarajan, Niekamp Andrew S, Gandhi Ripal T
Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Feb 18;39(1):75-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742390. eCollection 2022 Feb.
End-stage renal disease is a prevalent medical condition causing significant problems as the majority of patients are being treated with dialysis. While dialysis provides a means to compensate for the renal impairment, arteriovenous grafts and fistulas are often complicated by neointimal hyperplasia, loss of primary patency, and graft failure. Over the last decade, stent grafts have emerged as an alternative to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents for revascularization in the event of arteriovenous graft occlusion or stenosis. Several randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of stent grafts compared with balloon angioplasty for improving the function and durability of dialysis circuits. In this review, we present a comprehensive review of clinical trials. Stent grafts appear to offer increased primary patency over balloon angioplasty in the treatment of dialysis circuit stenosis. However, there is generally no significant difference between the two treatment modalities on other clinically relevant measures like complication rates and overall survival.
终末期肾病是一种普遍的医学病症,由于大多数患者都在接受透析治疗,因此会引发严重问题。虽然透析提供了一种弥补肾功能损害的方法,但动静脉移植物和瘘管常常会因新生内膜增生、原发性通畅性丧失和移植物衰竭而变得复杂。在过去十年中,覆膜支架已成为在动静脉移植物闭塞或狭窄时进行血管重建的一种替代球囊血管成形术和裸金属支架的方法。几项随机对照试验研究了覆膜支架与球囊血管成形术相比在改善透析回路功能和耐用性方面的疗效。在本综述中,我们对临床试验进行了全面回顾。在治疗透析回路狭窄方面,覆膜支架似乎比球囊血管成形术具有更高的原发性通畅率。然而,在并发症发生率和总生存率等其他临床相关指标上,这两种治疗方式通常没有显著差异。