Suppr超能文献

球囊血管成形术后支架置入与单纯球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析患者人工移植物流出道狭窄的前瞻性随机研究。

A prospective randomized study of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with prosthetic graft outflow stenosis.

机构信息

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Department, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao Yuan City, Taiwan.

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Department, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao Yuan City, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.062. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis graft outflow stenosis is a significant complication occurring in hemodialysis patients with prosthetic grafts for vascular access. Balloon angioplasty remains the first-line endovascular treatment of this complication, although covered stent graft implantation after balloon angioplasty also appears to be an effective and promising treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty in comparison to balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of graft outflow stenosis in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized study of 98 patients with clinically significant dialysis graft outflow stenosis treated in the vascular surgery section of a tertiary medical center. The patients were randomized into two groups; 49 patients were treated with stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty, and 49 patients were treated with balloon angioplasty alone. All patients underwent angiography of the graft site at 3 and 6 months after intervention, and restenosis rates were compared between the two groups. In addition, the duration of postintervention primary patency in the two groups was recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The postintervention restenosis rate of the stent graft placement group was superior to that seen in the balloon angioplasty alone group (9% vs 69% at 3 months [P < .0001] and 29% vs 72% at 6 months [P < .0001]). The mean postintervention primary patency duration was 380.22 ± 28.54 days for the stent graft placement group and 151.08 ± 16.79 days for the balloon angioplasty alone group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of stent grafts in hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis yielded superior results compared with the results seen in hemodialysis patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. Patients treated with stent grafts after balloon angioplasty had a lower restenosis rate and a longer duration of postintervention primary patency. The placement of a stent graft after balloon angioplasty appears to be an optimal therapeutic approach for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis.

摘要

背景

人造血管通路动静脉内瘘流出道狭窄是血液透析患者的一个重要并发症,尤其好发于使用人造血管作为血管通路的患者。球囊血管成形术仍然是治疗该并发症的一线血管腔内治疗方法,尽管球囊血管成形术后植入覆膜支架也似乎是一种有效且有前途的治疗方法。本研究旨在评估球囊血管成形术后支架置入术与单纯球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析患者人造血管流出道狭窄的疗效和耐久性。

方法

我们对在三级医学中心血管外科接受治疗的 98 例有临床意义的透析人造血管流出道狭窄患者进行了前瞻性随机研究。患者被随机分为两组;49 例患者接受球囊血管成形术后支架置入术,49 例患者接受单纯球囊血管成形术。所有患者在介入治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月均行移植物部位血管造影,比较两组的再狭窄率。此外,记录和分析两组患者术后即刻通畅率的持续时间。

结果

支架置入组术后再狭窄率优于单纯球囊血管成形组(3 个月时为 9%比 69%[P<0.0001],6 个月时为 29%比 72%[P<0.0001])。支架置入组术后即刻通畅率的平均持续时间为 380.22±28.54 天,单纯球囊血管成形组为 151.08±16.79 天(P<0.0001)。

结论

与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,支架置入术在治疗人造血管流出道狭窄的血液透析患者中效果更佳。球囊血管成形术后支架置入患者的再狭窄率较低,术后即刻通畅率持续时间较长。球囊血管成形术后支架置入术似乎是治疗人造血管流出道狭窄的血液透析患者的最佳治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验