Li Junyong, Charles Lachlan S, Yang Zhongling, Du Guozhen, Fu Shenglei
Dabieshan National Observation and Research Field Station of Forest Ecosystem, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 8;13:832473. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832473. eCollection 2022.
Fertilization is an effective management strategy to promote community biomass but can simultaneously reduce species diversity in many grassland systems. Shifts in competition for resources have been proposed to explain the decline in plant species diversity due to fertilization, yet the underlying mechanism driving species loss remains controversial. This uncertainty may be driven by variation in aboveground and belowground resource availability. However, experiments simultaneously manipulating both light availability and soil nutrients are rare. Using a 6-year field experiment to manipulate light availability ( shade cloth) and soil nutrients ( fertilizer addition), we tested this resource competition hypothesis in a species-rich alpine meadow by examining the variation of species traits associated with the capacity of light acquisition within these treatments. Our results showed that artificial shade decreased community biomass accumulation whereas fertilization increased it. In contrast, both shade and fertilization reduced species diversity. Extinction of non- species (e.g., and ) was the main reason for species diversity decline. Species loss can be explained by the limitation of light availability and predicted by species traits associated with light acquisition capability under fertilization and low light tolerance under artificial shade. Specifically, fertilization eliminated species with lower stature and artificial shade exterminated species with the higher light compensation point (LCP). The findings suggest that light availability is consistently important for plant growth and that low competitiveness for light under fertilization and intolerance of low light conditions under artificial shade trigger species loss process in the alpine meadow. Our experiment helps clarify the mechanisms of how artificial shade and fertilization decreased species diversity and highlight that LCP, which tends to be neglected by most of the studies, is one of the vital drivers in determining species coexistence.
施肥是促进群落生物量的一种有效管理策略,但同时会降低许多草地系统中的物种多样性。资源竞争的变化被认为可以解释施肥导致的植物物种多样性下降,但物种丧失的潜在机制仍存在争议。这种不确定性可能是由地上和地下资源可用性的变化所驱动的。然而,同时操纵光照可用性和土壤养分的实验很少见。我们通过一项为期6年的田间实验来操纵光照可用性(遮阳布)和土壤养分(添加肥料),通过检查这些处理中与光获取能力相关的物种性状变化,在一个物种丰富的高山草甸中检验了这一资源竞争假说。我们的结果表明,人工遮荫降低了群落生物量积累,而施肥则增加了生物量积累。相反,遮荫和施肥都降低了物种多样性。非优势物种(如[此处原文缺失具体物种名])的灭绝是物种多样性下降的主要原因。物种丧失可以用光可用性的限制来解释,并可以通过施肥条件下与光获取能力相关的物种性状以及人工遮荫下的低耐光性来预测。具体而言,施肥淘汰了较矮的物种,人工遮荫消灭了光补偿点(LCP)较高的物种。这些发现表明,光可用性对植物生长始终很重要,施肥条件下对光的低竞争力以及人工遮荫下对低光照条件的不耐受引发了高山草甸中的物种丧失过程。我们的实验有助于阐明人工遮荫和施肥如何降低物种多样性的机制,并强调光补偿点(大多数研究往往忽略了这一点)是决定物种共存的重要驱动因素之一。