Natale Patrizia, Perrone Ronald D, Tong Allison, Harris Tess, Hannan Elyssa, Ju Angela, Burnette Eva, Casteleijn Niek F, Chapman Arlene, Eastty Sarah, Gansevoort Ron T, Hogan Marie, Horie Shigeo, Knebelmann Bertrand, Lee Richard, Mustafa Reem A, Sandford Richard, Baumgart Amanda, Craig Jonathan C, Rangan Gopala K, Sautenet Bénédicte, Viecelli Andrea K, Amir Noa, Evangelidis Nicole, Guha Chandana, Logeman Charlotte, Manera Karine, Matus Gonzalez Andrea, Howell Martin, Strippoli Giovanni F M, Cho Yeoungjee
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Medicine, Nephrology, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Jul 6;15(3):407-416. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab110. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Pain is the highest prioritized patient-reported outcome in people with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) but remains infrequently and inconsistently measured in clinical trials and poorly managed in clinical settings. A recently completed systematic review of pain in ADPKD identified 26 different outcome measures. None of these measures were considered appropriate as a core outcome measure due to the lack of patient-important dimensions, inadequate content, relatively long duration of completion time and limited evidence to support psychometric robustness.
We convened an international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Polycystic Kidney Disease consensus workshop involving 21 patients/caregivers and 40 health professionals (clinicians, nurses, researchers, policy makers and industry representatives) from 18 countries to discuss the identification or development of a core outcome measure for pain.
Four themes were identified highlighting fundamental issues for the measurement of pain in ADPKD: distressing and disrupting life participation; variability and ambiguity in defining pain; stigma, frustration and adaptation to pain; and ensuring validity and feasibility of pain measures.
Existing measures were found to be insufficient in capturing pain as a core outcome and there was consensus on the need for a new validated measure that is simple, succinct and addresses the impact of pain on life participation. This measure will facilitate the appropriate prioritization of pain in all trials and guide clinical decision making in people with ADPKD.
疼痛是常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)患者报告的最优先考虑的结果,但在临床试验中对其测量仍不常见且不一致,在临床环境中管理不善。最近一项关于ADPKD疼痛的系统评价确定了26种不同的结局测量方法。由于缺乏对患者重要的维度、内容不充分、完成时间相对较长以及支持心理测量稳健性的证据有限,这些测量方法均未被视为合适的核心结局测量方法。
我们召集了一次国际肾脏病-多囊肾病标准化结局共识研讨会,有来自18个国家的21名患者/护理人员和40名卫生专业人员(临床医生、护士、研究人员、政策制定者和行业代表)参加,讨论确定或开发疼痛的核心结局测量方法。
确定了四个主题,突出了ADPKD疼痛测量的基本问题:困扰和扰乱生活参与;疼痛定义的变异性和模糊性;耻辱感、挫折感和对疼痛的适应;以及确保疼痛测量的有效性和可行性。
现有的测量方法不足以将疼痛作为核心结局进行评估,与会者一致认为需要一种新的经过验证的测量方法,该方法应简单、简洁,并能解决疼痛对生活参与的影响。这种测量方法将有助于在所有试验中对疼痛进行适当的优先排序,并指导ADPKD患者的临床决策。