Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1590-1613. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
In the present study, we used mouse tracking to investigate two processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval: First, we aimed to explore to what extent spontaneous retrieval of already completed PM intentions is supported by reflexive-associative and discrepancy-plus-search processes. Second, we aimed to disentangle whether costs to an ongoing task during the pursuit of a PM intention are associated with presumably resource-demanding monitoring processes or with a presumably resource-sparing strategic delay of ongoing-task responses. Our third aim was to explore the interaction of processes underlying costs to the ongoing task and processes of spontaneous retrieval. Our analyses replicated response-time patterns from previous studies indicating aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to ongoing-task performance, as well as increased aftereffects while pursuing a PM intention. Notably, based on our mouse-tracking analyses, we argue that aftereffects of completed intentions are best explained by a reflexive initiation of an already completed intention. If the completed intention is not performed in its entirety (i.e., no commission error), the reflexive initiation of the completed intention is followed by a subsequent movement correction that most likely represents a time-consuming response-verification process. Regarding performance costs in the ongoing task, our analyses suggest that actively pursuing a PM intention most likely leads to a strategic delay of ongoing activities. Lastly, we found that pursuing a novel PM task after intention completion exacerbated orienting responses to all deviant stimuli, exacerbated the readiness to initiate the completed intention reflexively, and substantially prolonged the response-verification process following this reflexive intention retrieval.
在本研究中,我们使用鼠标追踪技术来研究前瞻性记忆(PM)检索背后的两个过程:首先,我们旨在探讨自发检索已完成的 PM 意图在多大程度上受到反射性联想和差异加搜索过程的支持。其次,我们旨在区分在追求 PM 意图时对正在进行的任务的成本是否与可能需要资源的监测过程相关,还是与正在进行的任务响应的可能资源节约性策略延迟相关。我们的第三个目的是探索潜在的任务成本过程和自发检索过程之间的相互作用。我们的分析复制了之前研究的反应时模式,表明完成意图的后效和对正在进行的任务表现的成本,以及在追求 PM 意图时增加的后效。值得注意的是,基于我们的鼠标跟踪分析,我们认为完成意图的后效最好通过已经完成的意图的反射性启动来解释。如果未完全执行完成的意图(即无错误),则完成的意图的反射性启动会随后进行后续的运动校正,这很可能代表一个耗时的响应验证过程。关于正在进行的任务中的绩效成本,我们的分析表明,积极追求 PM 意图很可能导致对正在进行的活动的策略性延迟。最后,我们发现,在意图完成后追求新的 PM 任务会加剧对所有偏差刺激的定向反应,加剧反射性地启动已完成意图的准备,并且大大延长了随后的反射性意图检索后的响应验证过程。