Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Unplanned hospital admission after intended outpatient surgery is an undesirable outcome. We aimed to develop a prediction model that estimates a patient's risk of conversion from outpatient surgery to inpatient hospitalization.
This was a retrospective analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, 2005 to 2018. Conversion from outpatient to inpatient surgery was defined as having outpatient surgery and >1 day hospital stay. The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System was developed using multiple logistic regression on a training dataset (2005-2016) and compared to a model using the 26 relevant variables in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System was validated using a testing dataset (2017-2018). Performance statistics and Hosmer-Lemeshow plots were compared. Two high-risk definitions were compared: (1) the maximum Youden index, and (2) the cohort above the tenth decile of risk on the Hosmer-Lemeshow plot. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracies were compared.
In all, 2,822,379 patients were included; 3.6% of patients unexpectedly converted to inpatient. The 6-variable Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System model performed comparably to the 26-variable American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program model (c-indices = 0.818 vs. 0.823; Brier scores = 0.0308 vs 0.0306, respectively). The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System performed well on internal validation (c-index = 0.818, Brier score = 0.0341). The tenth decile of risk definition had higher specificity, positive predictive values, and accuracy than the maximum Youden index definition, while having lower sensitivity.
The Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System accurately predicted a patient's risk of unplanned outpatient-to-inpatient conversion. Patients at higher risk should be considered for inpatient surgery, while lower risk patients could safely undergo operations at ambulatory surgery centers.
计划门诊手术后的非计划性住院是一种不理想的结果。我们旨在开发一种预测模型,该模型可以估计患者从门诊手术转为住院治疗的风险。
这是一项使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库进行的回顾性分析,时间范围为 2005 年至 2018 年。将门诊手术转为住院手术定义为进行门诊手术且住院时间超过 1 天。使用多变量逻辑回归在训练数据集(2005-2016 年)上开发外科手术风险术前评估系统,并与使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划中 26 个相关变量的模型进行比较。使用测试数据集(2017-2018 年)对外科手术风险术前评估系统进行验证。比较了性能统计数据和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 图。比较了两种高风险定义:(1)最大约登指数,(2)Hosmer-Lemeshow 图上第十个十分位数以上的队列。比较了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率。
总共纳入了 2822379 名患者,其中 3.6%的患者意外转为住院。6 变量外科手术风险术前评估系统模型的表现与 26 变量美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划模型相当(c 指数分别为 0.818 与 0.823;Brier 分数分别为 0.0308 与 0.0306)。外科手术风险术前评估系统在内部验证中表现良好(c 指数为 0.818,Brier 分数为 0.0341)。风险第十个十分位数的定义具有比最大约登指数定义更高的特异性、阳性预测值和准确率,而敏感性较低。
外科手术风险术前评估系统可准确预测患者计划门诊手术转为非计划性住院的风险。风险较高的患者应考虑进行住院手术,而风险较低的患者可在门诊手术中心安全进行手术。