• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

充分知情同意:急性脑卒中试验的以患者为中心的知情同意。

Getting the Most out of Consent: Patient-Centered Consent for an Acute Stroke Trial.

机构信息

Associate professor in the Department of Medicine at the Emory University School of Medicine and in the Department of Epidemiology at the Emory University Rollins School of Public Health.

Resident in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Emory University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Mar;44(2):33-40. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500122.

DOI:10.1002/eahr.500122
PMID:35218601
Abstract

Informed consent for clinical trials in acute stroke is characterized by challenges related to urgency, cognitive impairment, and geographical separation. Context-appropriate approaches are needed for this setting. We conducted a mixed-methods project involving focus groups and interviews as well as collaboration with a patient advisory panel and a central institutional review board (CIRB) to design and implement a patient-driven consent process for a multicenter trial incorporating adaptive randomization. Remote consent was recognized as challenging but acceptable. Adaptive randomization was viewed positively, but significant potential for misunderstanding was appreciated. Collaboration between the patient advisory panel and the CIRB resulted in a shortened, more patient-centered consent form that was approved at all sites with few modifications. An information sheet was developed as a resource for patients and surrogates after enrollment. Collaboration between investigators, patient partners, and a CIRB can facilitate innovation and implementation of patient-centered, context-appropriate consent strategies.

摘要

在急性中风的临床试验中,知情同意书的特点是存在与紧迫性、认知障碍和地理隔离相关的挑战。针对这种情况,需要采用相应的方法。我们开展了一项混合方法研究,包括焦点小组和访谈,以及与患者咨询小组和中央机构审查委员会(CIRB)合作,为一项纳入适应性随机化的多中心试验设计和实施患者驱动的同意程序。远程同意被认为具有挑战性,但可以接受。适应性随机化受到了积极的评价,但也认识到存在潜在的重大误解。患者咨询小组和 CIRB 之间的合作促成了更简短、更以患者为中心的同意书,该同意书在所有地点获得批准,仅进行了少量修改。在入组后,还为患者和代理人制定了一份信息单作为资源。研究人员、患者伙伴和 CIRB 之间的合作可以促进以患者为中心、适合背景的同意策略的创新和实施。

相似文献

1
Getting the Most out of Consent: Patient-Centered Consent for an Acute Stroke Trial.充分知情同意:急性脑卒中试验的以患者为中心的知情同意。
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Mar;44(2):33-40. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500122.
2
Determinants of Patient and Surrogate Experiences With Acute Care Research Consent: A Key Informant Interview Study.患者和代理人对急性护理研究同意的体验的决定因素:关键知情人访谈研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e012599. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012599. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
The impact of central IRB's on informed consent readability and trial adherence in SPRINT.中央独立伦理委员会对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中知情同意书可读性及试验依从性的影响
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 6;15:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100407. eCollection 2019 Sep.
4
Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered "Exception from Informed Consent" trial.一项儿科多中心“知情同意豁免”试验中社区咨询与公众披露的变化
Clin Trials. 2015 Feb;12(1):67-76. doi: 10.1177/1740774514555586. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.与患者合作,弥合急性护理研究同意书中的差距。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):7-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745931.
7
Emergency Consent: Patients' and Surrogates' Perspectives on Consent for Clinical Trials in Acute Stroke and Myocardial Infarction.紧急情况下的同意:急性中风和心肌梗死临床试验中患者及其代理人对同意书的看法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010905. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010905.
8
Which factors influence the resort to surrogate consent in stroke trials, and what are the patient outcomes in this context?哪些因素影响在中风试验中采用替代同意,在此背景下患者的结局如何?
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 24;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0018-8.
9
Informed consent: the rate-limiting step in acute stroke trials.知情同意:急性脑卒中试验的限速步骤。
Front Neurol. 2011 Oct 17;2:65. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00065. eCollection 2011.
10
Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.了解急性护理中实用临床试验同意书的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):567-578. doi: 10.1177/1740774518801007. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive Trials in Stroke: Current Use and Future Directions.卒中适应性试验:当前应用与未来方向
Neurology. 2024 Oct 22;103(8):e209876. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209876. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
The ethical value of consulting community members in non-emergency trials conducted with waivers of informed consent for research.在为研究而放弃知情同意的非紧急试验中咨询社区成员的伦理价值。
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;22(1):100-108. doi: 10.1177/17407745241259360. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Challenge of achieving truly individualised informed consent in therapeutic endoscopy.
治疗性内镜检查中实现真正个性化知情同意的挑战。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 8;15(3):183-189. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102545. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Evolution and Future of Stroke Trials.中风试验的演变与未来
Stroke. 2024 Jul;55(7):1932-1939. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044265. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
5
Enhancing Enrollment in Acute Stroke Trials: Current State and Consensus Recommendations.提高急性脑卒中试验的入组率:现状和共识建议。
Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2698-2707. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044149. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
Recruitment in Acute Stroke Trials: Challenges and Potential Solutions.急性脑卒中试验的招募:挑战与潜在解决方案。
Stroke. 2023 Feb;54(2):632-638. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040071. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Risk Factors of Recurrent Stroke in Young and Middle-Aged Stroke Patients after Interventional Therapy.中青年介入治疗后脑卒中患者再发脑卒中的危险因素。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 25;2022:5728991. doi: 10.1155/2022/5728991. eCollection 2022.